Autodesk Inc v. Flowers et al
Filing
30
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 27 . Case Management Conference set for 11/24/2010 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Koh on 9/29/2010. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2010)
Autodesk Inc v. Flowers et al
Doc. 30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ERIC DONEY, #76260 eric@donahue.com JULIE E. HOFER, #152185 julie@donahue.com ERIC A. HANDLER, #224637 ehandler@donahue.com DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP 1999 Harrison Street, 25th Floor Oakland, California 94612-3520 Telephone: (510) 451-0544 Facsimile: (510) 832-1486 Attorneys for Plaintiff AUTODESK, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
AUTODESK, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. GUILLERMO FLORES, an individual; GREG FLOWERS, an individual; GREGORIO FLORES, an individual; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.
CASE NO. CV 10-01917-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Current CMC Date: Requested Date: Time: Dept.: Judge: October 6, 2010 November 10, 2010 2:00 p.m. Courtroom 4, 5th Floor Hon. Lucy H. Koh
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. CV 10-01917LHK
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Continue Case Management Conference, supported by the Declaration of Julie E. Hofer, and based thereon, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for November 24, 2010 October 6, 2010 shall be continued to November 10, 2010 at 2:00 p.m., with all related dates adjusted accordingly. Dated: September 29, 2010 Hon. Lucy H. Koh United States District Court Judge
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. CV 10-01917LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?