Silicon Economics, Inc v. Financial Accounting Foundation et al

Filing 10

ORDER VACATING MAY 7 ORDER AND TERMINATING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re 9 Stipulation. The Court finds good cause to vacates its May 7, 2010 Order setting hearing for Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plai ntiff may renew its Motion after the Court's disposition of Defendants' anticipated Motion to Dismiss. Since the Court's calendar is completely full until the Fall of 2010, Defendants shall examine the Court's availability (posted online) and notice its Motion in accordance with the Civil Local Rules. Please see Order for further specifics. ***Motions terminated: 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/12/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNIT ED Jeffrey L. Bornstein (SBN 99358) Jeff.Bornstein@klgates.com K&L GATES LLP 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 882-8200 Facsimile: (415) 882-8220 S S DISTRICT TE C TA John G. Stretton, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice to be filed) jstretton@eapdlaw.com EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE LLP Three Stamford Plaza 301 Tresser Boulevard Stamford, CT 06901 Telephone: (203) 353-6844 Facsimile: (800) 232-0862 Attorneys for Defendants Financial Accounting Foundation and Financial Accounting Standards Board ER N D IS T IC T R OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION SILICON ECONOMICS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING FOUNDATION and FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, Defendants. Case No. CV-10-01939 HW-HRL ORDER VACATING MAY 7 ORDER STIPULATION AND ORDER AND TERMINATING PLAINTIFF'S MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY AND RE-SETTING HEARING DATES INJUNCTION Based on the representations made in the parties' Stipulation, the Court finds good cause to vacates its May 7, 2010 Order setting hearing for Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. However, in light of Plaintiff's agreement to allow Defendants to first challenge the Complaint, the Court orders that the pending Motion for Preliminary Injunction be terminated from the Docket. (Docket Item No. 2.) Plaintiff may renew its Motion after the Court's diposition of Defendants' anticipated Motion to Dismiss. Since the Court's calendar is completely full until the Fall of 2010, Defendants shall examine the Court's availability (posted online) and notice its Motion in accordance with the Civil Local Rules. Dated: May 12, 2010 ______________________________ JAMES WARE STIPULATION AND ORDER United StatesBRIEFING SCHEDULE AND MODIFYING District Judge RE-SETTING HEARING DATES SF-211262 V1 A C LI FO mes Wa Judge Ja re R NIA DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?