Shropshire v. Canning

Filing 91

Order Granting 89 Motion for Extension of Time to File Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendant Patricia Trigg. Signed by Judge Koh on 9/9/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 ELMO SHROPSHIRE, d/b/a/ ELMO PUBLISHING, 14 Plaintiff, 16 PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT PATRICIA TRIGG v. 15 Case No. 5:10-CV-01941-LHK AUBREY CANNING, Jr., and PATRICIA TRIGG d/b/a KRISS PUBLISHING, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Under this Court’s Case Management and Minute Order, issued August 25, 2011, by September 8, 2011, the parties were to file a stipulation of dismissal with respect to Patricia Trigg. See Dkt. #87. However, if, by September 8, 2011, the parties are not able to file a stipulation of dismissal, they were to file a joint status report explaining why additional time is necessary and setting forth a new deadline by which they will file a stipulation of dismissal with respect to Ms. Trigg. While the parties have reached an agreement in principle, Mr. Shropshire has not yet had the opportunity to execute the Settlement Agreement and requests a 10-day extension. The Court finds an extension warranted. // 28 -1- DLA P IPER LLP (US) SAN FRANCISCO WEST\224669590.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 5:10-CV-01941-LHK 1 2 Accordingly, the parties’ time to file a Stipulation of Dismissal is extended to September 19, 2011. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 9, 2011 Dated: September ____, 2011 5 _________________________________ 6 THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- DLA P IPER LLP (US) SAN FRANCISCO WEST\224669590.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 5:10-CV-01941-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?