Shropshire v. Canning
Filing
91
Order Granting 89 Motion for Extension of Time to File Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendant Patricia Trigg. Signed by Judge Koh on 9/9/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
ELMO SHROPSHIRE, d/b/a/ ELMO
PUBLISHING,
14
Plaintiff,
16
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT PATRICIA TRIGG
v.
15
Case No. 5:10-CV-01941-LHK
AUBREY CANNING, Jr., and PATRICIA
TRIGG d/b/a KRISS PUBLISHING,
17
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Under this Court’s Case Management and Minute Order, issued August 25, 2011, by
September 8, 2011, the parties were to file a stipulation of dismissal with respect to Patricia
Trigg. See Dkt. #87. However, if, by September 8, 2011, the parties are not able to file a
stipulation of dismissal, they were to file a joint status report explaining why additional time is
necessary and setting forth a new deadline by which they will file a stipulation of dismissal with
respect to Ms. Trigg. While the parties have reached an agreement in principle, Mr. Shropshire
has not yet had the opportunity to execute the Settlement Agreement and requests a 10-day
extension. The Court finds an extension warranted.
//
28
-1-
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SAN FRANCISCO
WEST\224669590.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
5:10-CV-01941-LHK
1
2
Accordingly, the parties’ time to file a Stipulation of Dismissal is extended to September
19, 2011.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
9, 2011
Dated: September ____, 2011
5
_________________________________
6
THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
7
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SAN FRANCISCO
WEST\224669590.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
5:10-CV-01941-LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?