Lerma v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 75

ORDER CONTINUING SHOW CAUSE HEARING. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 7/31/2012 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/10/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 ** E-filed July 10, 2012** 2 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 ANTHONY LERMA, Plaintiff, v. No. C10-01991 HRL ORDER CONTINUING SHOW CAUSE HEARING KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.; ET AL., Defendants. ____________________________________/ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties in this action have informed the court that they have finalized the terms of their settlement and release agreement, and are only awaiting signature by Defendant’s representative. They request that the court continue the show cause hearing to afford the parties time to complete execution of the settlement and file a stipulation for dismissal. See Dkt. No. 74. The court finds good cause to GRANT the continuance. The Show Cause hearing currently set for July 17, 2012 is continued to July 31, 2012, 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 10, 2012 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 C 10-01991 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: 2 Kenneth Moore Tanya Moore Leila Narvid Rodney Sorenson 3 natalyn@moorelawfirm.com tanya@moorelawfirm.com LN@paynefears.com rbs@paynefears.com 4 Notice will be mailed to: 5 6 7 8 Hieng Seav dba Kim Tar Restaurant 2351 A McKee Road San Jose, CA 95116 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?