Pierce v. Astrue
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Extension of Time to File Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 11/24/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 11/24/2010)
Pierce v. Astrue
Doc. 21
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, SBN CA 189450 Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8943 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Attorneys for Defendant
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ALAN K. PIERCE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) CIVIL NO. 10-02017-PVT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S CROSSMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 45-day extension of time up and through January 7, 2011, in which to e-file his Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is requested because counsel for Defendant needs additional time to review the case. /// /// /// /// /// /// ///
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: November 23, 2010
/s/ Harvey P. Sackett (As authorized telephone on 11/23/2010) HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Dated: November 23, 2010
By:
/s/ Theophous H. Reagans THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant United States Attorney
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: ______11/24/10_________
_____________________________ PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?