Meru Networks, Inc. v. Extricom, Ltd.

Filing 32

ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 4 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (rmwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant's administrative motion to seal (Docket No. 4) is denied. Defendant's request anticipated that plaintiff would consider certain information contained within the papers supporting defendant's motion to dismiss transfer or stay to be confidential. In response to the court's July 23, 2010 order, however, plaintiff has agreed that the information is not confidential and has stated that it has no objection to the public filing of the affected documents. Accordingly, defendant's administrative motion to seal is denied. Within four days, defendant shall file in the public record an unredacted copy of its memorandum of points and authorities (Docket No. 13) and the declaration and exhibits in support of the motion (Docket No. 17) in conformance with General Order No. 62 and Local Rule 79-5, or withdraw its motion. v. EXTRICOM LTD., Defendant. MERU NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff, No. C-10-2021 RMW ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL [Re Docket No. 4] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION E-FILED on 8/16/10 DATED: 8/16/10 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL--No. C-10-2021 RMW TER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?