Genentech, Inc. v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

Filing 121

ORDER Approving Party Stipulation. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/25/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2011)

Download PDF
Genentech, Inc. v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania Doc. 121 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M. PATRICIA THAYER (SBN 90818) pthayer@sidley.com AARON R. BLEHARSKI (SBN 240703) ableharski@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 SANDRA S. FUJIYAMA (SBN 198125) sfujiyama@sidley.com SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291) stiu@sidley.com TASHICA T. WILLIAMS (SBN 256449) ttwilliams@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90013 Telephone: (213) 896-6000 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 Attorneys for Plaintiff GENENTECH, INC. ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065) rvannest@kvn.com ASHOK RAMANI (SBN 200020) aramani@kvn.com NIKKI K. VO (SBN 239543) nvo@kvn.com SARAH B. FAULKNER (SBN 263857) sfaulkner@kvn.com KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION GENENTECH, INC., Plaintiff, vs. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania non-profit corporation, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No: 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG) SIXTH JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR GENENTECH TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO THE COURT'S NOVEMBER 22 ORDER Hearing Date: TBD Time: TBD Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh SIXTH JOINT STIP. RE DEADLINE TO OBJECT TO THE COURT'S NOV. 22 ORDER CASE NO. 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS on February 1, 2011, plaintiff Genentech, Inc. ("Genentech") and defendant the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania ("the University") filed a Fifth Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend the Deadline for Genentech to File Objections to the Court's November 22 Order (Dkt. No. 86) to February 15, 2011; and WHEREAS the parties wanted the deadline extension to discuss whether there is a way to limit Genentech's production of regulatory materials, other than the BLA Submissions (as that term is used in the Court's November 22 Order), to avoid the production of irrelevant materials; and WHEREAS, the parties are continuing to address the proper scope for production of the regulatory materials and believe that an additional extension would benefit their discussion; and WHEREAS, the parties are continuing to arrange an appropriate manner in which to proceed with the production; and WHEREAS, if the parties are unable to reach agreement, Genentech may wish to file objections to the Court's Order; THE PARTIES THEREFORE AGREE as follows: 1. The deadline for Genentech to object with respect to the following sentence in the Court's November 22, 2010 Order, now set for February 15, 2011, is extended to March 1, 2011: In addition, to the extent there is responsive electronic data other than the BLA Submissions in Defendant's possession, custody or control that is responsive to Document Request No. 36, Plaintiff shall either produce the unredacted data to Defendant by November 30, 2010, or else file a declaration by that date showing why it cannot do so and setting forth the earliest possible date that it will be able to do so. 2. No other provision of the Court's November 22, 2010 Order is changed. SIXTH JOINT STIP. RE DEADLINE TO OBJECT TO THE COURT'S NOV. 22 ORDER CASE NO. 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 SO STIPULATED: Respectfully submitted, Dated: February 15, 2011 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP By: /s/ M. PATRICIA THAYER Attorneys for Plaintiff GENENTECH, INC. Dated: February 15, 2011 IRELL & MANELLA LLP By: /s/ GARY N. FRISCHLING 1 Attorneys for Defendants THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA 1 27 28 Pursuant to General Order 45(X), the filer of this document hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from Gary N. Frischling. 2 SIXTH JOINT STIP. RE DEADLINE TO OBJECT TO THE COURT'S NOV. 22 ORDER CASE NO. 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The deadline for Genentech to object with respect to the following sentence in the Court's November 22, 2010 Order, now set for February 15, 2011, is extended to March 1, 2011: In addition, to the extent there is responsive electronic data other than the BLA Submissions in Defendant's possession, custody or control that is responsive to Document Request No. 36, Plaintiff shall either produce the unredacted data to Defendant by November 30, 2010, or else file a declaration by that date showing why it cannot do so and setting forth the earliest possible date that it will be able to do so. 2. No other provision of the Court's November 22, 2010 Order is changed. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION CASE NO. 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG) SO ORDERED. February 25 Dated: _______________, 2011 LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?