Genentech, Inc. v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS (PRIVATE ADR) re 12 Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Early Neutral Evaluation filed by Genentech, Inc., Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/30/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2010)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. 4:10-cv-2037-PJH Plaintiff(s), v.
The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private mediation at JAMS. 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9
November 18, 2010 other requested deadline _____________________________________________
Ju_ _ , 20 __ Dated:__ly_29___10 _
/ _ M _ t i _a Tha _ r _s/ __._Pa_r_ci____ye______________ Attorney for Plaintiff / _ J_ on G She_ by _s/ _as____.___as________________ Attorney for Defendant
Ju_ _ , 20 __ Dated:__ly_29___10 __
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order. November 18, 2010 9 other ___________________ IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT TE C TA
RT U O
______________________D ____________ _ ERE
7/30/ __ Dated:______10 ________
UNITED STATES DISTRIltCT n Hami o
Judge P hyllis J.
IT IS S
F D IS T IC T O R
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
M. PATRICIA THAYER (SBN 90818) email@example.com AARON R. BLEHARSKI (SBN 240703) firstname.lastname@example.org SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 SANDRA S. FUJIYAMA (SBN 198125) email@example.com SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291) firstname.lastname@example.org TASHICA T. WILLIAMS (SBN 256449) email@example.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90013 Telephone: (213) 896-6000 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 Attorneys for Plaintiff GENENTECH, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION GENENTECH, INC., Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant and Counterclaimant Case No: 4:10-CV-2037-PJH
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION RE: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION RE: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 4:10-CV-2037-PJH
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 29, 2010
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order 45(X), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the attached Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process has been obtained from Jason G. Sheasby.
Respectfully Submitted, By: /s/ M. Patricia Thayer M. Patricia Thayer (SBN 90818) Aaron R. Bleharski (SBN 240703) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 Sandra S. Fujiyama (SBN 198125) Samuel N. Tiu (SBN 216291) Tashica T. Williams (SBN 256449) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90013 Telephone: (213) 896-6000 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 Attorneys for Plaintiff Genentech, Inc.
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION RE: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 4:10-CV-2037-PJH L
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?