Genentech, Inc. v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
Filing
444
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 442 Motion ; denying 443 Motion to Shorten Time (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
M. PATRICIA THAYER (SBN 90818)
pthayer@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 772-1200
Facsimile: (415) 772-7400
JEFFREY P. KUSHAN (pro hac vice)
jkushan@sidley.com
JAMES A. HIGH JR.
jhigh@sidley.com (SBN 240781)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1501 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 736-8000
Facsimile: (202) 736-8711
ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065)
rvannest@kvn.com
ASHOK RAMANI (SBN 200020)
aramani@kvn.com
SARAH B. FAULKNER (SBN 263857)
sfaulkner@kvn.com
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, California 94111-1809
Telephone: (415) 391-5400
Facsimile: (415) 397-7188
SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291)
stiu@sidley.com
TASHICA T. WILLIAMS (SBN 256449)
ttwilliams@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: (213) 896-6000
Facsimile: (213) 896-6600
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant
GENENTECH, INC.
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN JOSE DIVISION
20
GENENTECH, INC.,
21
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,
22
23
vs.
24
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania non-profit
corporation,
25
26
27
Defendant and Counterclaimant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No:
5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG)
ORDER GRANTING, in part
GENENTECH, INC’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
RESCHEDULE MOTION OPPOSITION
AND HEARING DATE
[As Modified by the Court]
28
ORDER GRANTING IN PART GENENTECH, INC’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RESCHEDULE MOTION
OPPOSITION AND HEARING DATE
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG)
Before this Court is Plaintiff Genentech, Inc.’s Administrative Motion To Reschedule
1
2
Motion Opposition and Hearing Date.1 UPENN filed its motion for summary judgment on
3
December 29, 2011 and noticed the hearing date for February 2, 2012 without first contacting the
4
Courtroom Deputy to obtain a hearing date as is required by the Court’s standing order. ECF No. at
5
437. The noticed hearing date of February 2, 2012 is at capacity. Genentech filed a motion seeking
6
to extend the deadline for its response and seeking to have the hearing date reset. ECF No. 442.
7
Having considered the matter, and good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that:
8
9
Genentech’s Opposition to UPENN’s Motion for Summary Judgment is due by March 1, 2012,
10
UPENN’s Reply is due by March 22, 2012,
11
The hearing on UPENN’s Motion for Summary Judgment is set for April 19, 2012.
12
Each party is limited to one 25-page dispositive motion as set forth in the Case Management
13
14
Order of November 17, 2011. ECF No. 413. The Court considers UPenn’s Motion for Summary
15
Judgment as its one 25-page dispositive motion. UPenn may not file any additional motion for
16
summary judgment without first seeking leave of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
19
20
Dated: January 4, 2012
HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
28
Genentech’s motion to shorten time is denied as moot.
1
ORDER GRANTING IN PART GENENTECH, INC’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RESCHEDULE MOTION
OPPOSITION AND HEARING DATE
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?