Genentech, Inc. v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

Filing 444

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 442 Motion ; denying 443 Motion to Shorten Time (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 M. PATRICIA THAYER (SBN 90818) pthayer@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 JEFFREY P. KUSHAN (pro hac vice) jkushan@sidley.com JAMES A. HIGH JR. jhigh@sidley.com (SBN 240781) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1501 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 736-8000 Facsimile: (202) 736-8711 ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065) rvannest@kvn.com ASHOK RAMANI (SBN 200020) aramani@kvn.com SARAH B. FAULKNER (SBN 263857) sfaulkner@kvn.com KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 633 Battery Street San Francisco, California 94111-1809 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291) stiu@sidley.com TASHICA T. WILLIAMS (SBN 256449) ttwilliams@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90013 Telephone: (213) 896-6000 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant GENENTECH, INC. 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN JOSE DIVISION 20 GENENTECH, INC., 21 Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, 22 23 vs. 24 THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania non-profit corporation, 25 26 27 Defendant and Counterclaimant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No: 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG) ORDER GRANTING, in part GENENTECH, INC’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RESCHEDULE MOTION OPPOSITION AND HEARING DATE [As Modified by the Court] 28 ORDER GRANTING IN PART GENENTECH, INC’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RESCHEDULE MOTION OPPOSITION AND HEARING DATE CASE NO. 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG) Before this Court is Plaintiff Genentech, Inc.’s Administrative Motion To Reschedule 1 2 Motion Opposition and Hearing Date.1 UPENN filed its motion for summary judgment on 3 December 29, 2011 and noticed the hearing date for February 2, 2012 without first contacting the 4 Courtroom Deputy to obtain a hearing date as is required by the Court’s standing order. ECF No. at 5 437. The noticed hearing date of February 2, 2012 is at capacity. Genentech filed a motion seeking 6 to extend the deadline for its response and seeking to have the hearing date reset. ECF No. 442. 7 Having considered the matter, and good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that: 8 9 Genentech’s Opposition to UPENN’s Motion for Summary Judgment is due by March 1, 2012, 10 UPENN’s Reply is due by March 22, 2012, 11 The hearing on UPENN’s Motion for Summary Judgment is set for April 19, 2012. 12 Each party is limited to one 25-page dispositive motion as set forth in the Case Management 13 14 Order of November 17, 2011. ECF No. 413. The Court considers UPenn’s Motion for Summary 15 Judgment as its one 25-page dispositive motion. UPenn may not file any additional motion for 16 summary judgment without first seeking leave of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 20 Dated: January 4, 2012 HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 Genentech’s motion to shorten time is denied as moot. 1 ORDER GRANTING IN PART GENENTECH, INC’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RESCHEDULE MOTION OPPOSITION AND HEARING DATE CASE NO. 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?