Genentech, Inc. v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

Filing 446

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 436 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)

Case5:10-cv-02037-LHK Document445-1 Filed01/05/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

M. PATRICIA THAYER (SBN 90818)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
SANDRA S. FUJIYAMA (SBN 198125)
[e-mail]
SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291)
[e-mail]
TASHICA T. WILLIAMS (SBN 256449)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065)
[e-mail]
ASHOK RAMANI (SBN 200020)
[e-mail]
SARA B. FAULKNER (SBN 263857)
[e-mail]
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JEFFREY P. KUSHAN (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JAMES A. HIGH JR. (SBN 240781)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1501 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim Defendant
GENENTECH, INC.

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN JOSE DIVISION

21
22

GENENTECH, INC.,
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,

23
24
vs.
25
26

THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania non-profit
corporation,

27
Defendant and Counterclaimant.
28

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No:

5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG)

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: THE
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA'S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL (A) PORTIONS OF ITS
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION AND (B) CERTAIN
EXHIBITS THERETO
As Modified by the Court

[PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG)

Case5:10-cv-02037-LHK Document445-1 Filed01/05/12 Page2 of 2

1

Having reviewed the Declaration of James A High Jr. in Support of the University of

2

Pennsylvania’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (A) Portions of Its Motion for Summary

3

Adjudication and (B) Certain Exhibits Thereto, and for good cause appearing, it is hereby

4

ORDERED that the following shall be sealed:

5
6
7

•

Exhibit 50 to the Declaration of Jason Sheasby In Support of the University’s Motion
for Summary Adjudication.

8

10

For good cause shown, the above document is to be filed under seal. The remainder of
UPenn's motion to file under seal is DENIED. ECF No. 436. UPenn shall
file the documents in accordance with General Order 62.

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12

January 18
Dated: _____________, 2012

9

13

Lucy H. Koh
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER
CASE NO. 5:10-CV-2037-LHK (PSG)