Genentech, Inc. v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

Filing 574

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 572 Request for Clarification re: Dr. Greene's Trial Attendance.(lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 GENENTECH, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania non-profit corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 10-CV-02037-LHK ORDER CLARIFYING TRIAL ATTENDANCE OF DR. MARK GREENE (re: dkt. #572) 17 On May 7, 2012, Genentech filed an Administrative Motion for Clarification Concerning 18 Trial Attendance of Dr. Mark Greene. See ECF No. 572. Although the Civil Local Rules allow U 19 Penn four days to file an opposition to Genentech’s administrative motion, the nature of relief 20 Genentech seeks is time sensitive and is not adverse to U Penn’s interests. Accordingly, the Court 21 finds good cause to GRANT Genentech’s request and clarifies as follows: Genentech’s motion to 22 compel Dr. Greene’s jury trial attendance shall be filed by May 14, 2012, and shall not exceed 5 23 pages in length. U Penn’s opposition to such motion, also not to exceed 5 pages in length, shall be 24 due May 21, 2012. Neither party’s brief shall count towards its limit for motions in limine and 25 Daubert motions, which are due May 11, 2012. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: May 10, 2012 28 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 1 Case No.: 10-CV-02037-LHK ORDER CLARIFYING TRIAL ATTENDANCE OF DR. MARK GREENE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?