Convergence Technologies (USA), LLC v. Microloops Corporation et al

Filing 143

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 141 PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO RESET HEARING. Having reviewed the moving, responding and reply papers filed for the Motion to Stay, the court finds it appropriate for determination without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for 4/6/2012 is VACATED. A written decision on the Motion to Stay shall issue in short order. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/2/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02051 EJD

CONVERGENCE TECHNOLOGIES
(USA), LLC,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RESET
HEARING

Plaintiff(s),
v.

13
MICROLOOPS CORPORATION, et. al.,
14
15

[Docket Item No. 141]
Defendant(s).
/

16
17

Presently before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Reset the hearing date on Defendant’s

18

Motion to Stay this case pending the outcome of patent re-examinations. See Docket Item No. 141.

19

The court previously advanced the hearing date on the Motion to Stay from May 4, 2012, to April 6,

20

2012. See Docket Item No. 140.

21

Having reviewed the moving, responding and reply papers filed for the Motion to Stay, the

22

court finds it appropriate for determination without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-

23

1(b). Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for April 6, 2012, is VACATED. A written decision on

24

the Motion to Stay shall issue in short order. Plaintiff’s Motion to Reset is DENIED AS MOOT.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated: April 2, 2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

27
28
1

CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02051 EJD
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RESET