Kowalsky v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 18

ORDER SETTING TIME FOR FILING BRIEFS (approving 17 ). Case Management Conference and Motion Hearing set for 11/12/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/16/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2010)

Download PDF
Kowalsky v. Hewlett-Packard Company Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP **E-Filed 7/16/2010** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CHAIM KOWALSKY, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY and DOES 1 Through 100, inclusive, Defendant. CASE NO. 10-CV-02176 JF ------------------- ORDER SETTING TIME FOR [PROPOSED] FILING BRIEFS Honorable Jeremy Fogel /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING TIME FOR FILING BRIEFS Case No. 10-CV-02176 JF Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE STIPULATION filed by the parties on July 15, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Hewlett Packard Company shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on or before August 20, 2010, and that, should HP make a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b) ("Motion"), Plaintiff shall have until October 4, 2010 to oppose HP's Motion. HP's reply to Plaintiff's opposition, if any, shall be filed on or before October 25, 2010. The Status Conference currently set for August 27, 2010, shall be continued to November 12, 2010 to coincide with the Hearing on HP's Motion. 7/16/2010 DATED: _____________________ ____________________________________ Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING TIME FOR FILING BRIEFS Case No. 10-CV-02176 JF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?