Kowalsky v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filing
37
ORDER SETTING TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ANSWER pursuant to 36 parties' stipulation. Signed by Judge Koh on 12/29/2010. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2010)
<![CDATA[
Kowalsky v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Doc. 37
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
CHAIM KOWALSKY, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY and DOES 1 Through 100, inclusive, Defendant.
CASE NO. 10-CV-02176 LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO AMEND HIS COMPLAINT AND FOR DEFENDANT HEWLETTPACKARD COMPANY TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE OPERATIVE COMPLAINT Honorable Lucy H. Koh
/// /// /// /// /// /// /// ///
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 10-CV-02176 LHK
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE STIPULATION submitted by the parties on December 23, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until January 12, 2011 to amend his complaint, and that Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company shall have until February 11, 2011 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's operative complaint, whether or not Plaintiff files a Second Amended Complaint.
DATED:
December 29, 2010 Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 10-CV-02176 LHK
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
