Dang v. Sutter's Place, Inc. et al

Filing 191

STIPULATION AND ORDER 190 to Set a New Trial Date: Jury Trial set for 4/29/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Pretrial Conference set for 4/18/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/24/12. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JAMES McMANIS (40958) SHARON KIRSCH (157157) MATTHEW SCHECHTER (212003) McMANIS FAULKNER A Professional Corporation 50 West San Fernando Street, 10th Floor San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: 408-279-8700 Facsimile: 408-279-3244 Email: skirsch@mcmanislaw.com mschechter@mcmanislaw.com Attorneys for Defendant, SUTTER’S PLACE, INC. dba BAY 101 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 10 11 CUC DANG, Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 10-CV-02181 (RMW) STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO SET A NEW TRIAL DATE vs. 14 15 SUTTER’S PLACE, INC. dba BAY 101 or BAY 101 CASINO, et. al., 16 Complaint Filed: May 20, 2010 Original Trial Date: September 10, 2012 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, Cuc Dang (“Dang”), and defendant, Sutter’s Place, Inc. dba Bay 101 (“Bay 21 101”) (collectively “the parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby 22 stipulate to the following: 1. 23 24 Trial in the above-captioned matter was scheduled to begin on Monday, September 10, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. before The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte in Courtroom 6. 2. 25 On Wednesday, September 5, 2012, the parties received an email from Jackie 26 Lynn Garcia, Judge Whyte’s clerk, advising the parties that the Court would be unable to begin 27 trial on September 10th and asking if the parties could continue the trial date by one week. 28 /// 1 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO SET A NEW TRIAL DATE; CASE NO. 10-CV-02181 (RMW) (PSG) 1 2 3. 4. In response to Bay 101’s email, the Court asked the parties to pick new dates for 5. After meeting and conferring on possible dates, and taking into account counsels’ date. 3 4 Bay 101 advised the Court that it was unable to continue the September 10th start trial. 5 6 respective calendars and availability, the parties have agreed on a new date of Monday, April 29, 7 2013. 8 9 6. The parties also jointly request that the Court issue its written Order on the pending Motions in Limine so that they can prepare for trial. 10 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 12 13 [In accordance with General Order 45.X.B., Matthew Schechter, counsel for defendant, attests that plaintiff’s counsel, Ann Nguyen, has concurred in this filing.] 14 15 Dated: September 24, 2012 McMANIS FAULKNER 16 /s/ Matthew Schechter MATTHEW SCHECHETR 17 18 Attorneys for Defendant SUTTER’S PLACE, INC. dba BAY 101 19 20 21 Dated: September 24, 2012 ROBINSON & WOOD, INC. 22 /s/ Ann A. Nguyen ANN A. NGUYEN 23 24 Attorneys for Plaintiff, CUC DANG 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO SET A NEW TRIAL DATE; CASE NO. 10-CV-02181 (RMW) (PSG) 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation above, trial in the matter of Cuc Dang v. Sutter’s Place, Inc. 3 dba Bay 101, United States District Court Case No. 10-CV-02181 (RMW) (PSG), is now set for 4 Monday, April 29, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. before The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte in Courtroom 6. 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: _________________, 2012 _________________________________ JUDGE RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO SET A NEW TRIAL DATE; CASE NO. 10-CV-02181 (RMW) (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?