Dang v. Sutter's Place, Inc. et al
Filing
194
Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte granting in part and denying in part 120 Motion for Discovery (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2013)
1
2
3
4
E-FILED on
3/20/13
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. C-10-02181 RMW
CUC DANG,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUTTER'S PLACE, INC. dba BAY 101 or
BAY 101 CASINO, UNITE HERE! LOCAL
19, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
RULINGS ON PLAINTIFF'S OFFER OF
DEPOSITION AND DISCOVERY
RESPONSES AS EVIDENCE
Re: Dkt. No. 120
Defendants.
18
19
The court GRANTS plaintiff's request to offer defendant Bay 101's Responses to Plaintiff's
20
Special Interrogatories Nos. 1-3 as evidence at trial. Defendant Bay 101 does not object to the these
21
proposed discovery responses.
22
The court DENIES plaintiff's request to offer the excerpts from the deposition transcript of
23
Suping Zeng ("Zeng") at trial. Zeng is not a party to the litigation, so her deposition is not generally
24
admissible under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 32(a)(3). Zeng's deposition is
25
admissible under Rule 32(a)(4) only if plaintiff (A) is dead, (B) is located more than 100 miles
26
away, (C) is to old or ill to testify or is imprisoned, (D) if Zeng's attendance cannot be procured by
27
subpoena, or (E) if on motion and notice, exceptional circumstances are shown. In this case, Zeng's
28
restaurant is located in San Jose, California, Zeng recently appeared for her deposition, and plaintiff
RULINGS ON PLAINTIFF'S OFFER OF DEPOSITION AND DISCOVERY RESPONSES AS EVIDENCE—No. C-10-02181 RMW
ALG
1
makes no allegation that Zeng is otherwise located more than 100 miles away or unavailable to
2
testify under any other exception in Rule 32(a)(4). Accordingly, the court denies plantiff's request to
3
offer her deposition testimony at trial in leiu of her presence.
4
5
DATED:
March 20, 2013
6
7
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RULINGS ON PLAINTIFF'S OFFER OF DEPOSITION AND DISCOVERY RESPONSES AS EVIDENCE—No. C-10-02181 RMW
ALG
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?