Dang v. Sutter's Place, Inc. et al

Filing 194

Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte granting in part and denying in part 120 Motion for Discovery (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 E-FILED on 3/20/13 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. C-10-02181 RMW CUC DANG, Plaintiff, v. SUTTER'S PLACE, INC. dba BAY 101 or BAY 101 CASINO, UNITE HERE! LOCAL 19, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, RULINGS ON PLAINTIFF'S OFFER OF DEPOSITION AND DISCOVERY RESPONSES AS EVIDENCE Re: Dkt. No. 120 Defendants. 18 19 The court GRANTS plaintiff's request to offer defendant Bay 101's Responses to Plaintiff's 20 Special Interrogatories Nos. 1-3 as evidence at trial. Defendant Bay 101 does not object to the these 21 proposed discovery responses. 22 The court DENIES plaintiff's request to offer the excerpts from the deposition transcript of 23 Suping Zeng ("Zeng") at trial. Zeng is not a party to the litigation, so her deposition is not generally 24 admissible under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 32(a)(3). Zeng's deposition is 25 admissible under Rule 32(a)(4) only if plaintiff (A) is dead, (B) is located more than 100 miles 26 away, (C) is to old or ill to testify or is imprisoned, (D) if Zeng's attendance cannot be procured by 27 subpoena, or (E) if on motion and notice, exceptional circumstances are shown. In this case, Zeng's 28 restaurant is located in San Jose, California, Zeng recently appeared for her deposition, and plaintiff RULINGS ON PLAINTIFF'S OFFER OF DEPOSITION AND DISCOVERY RESPONSES AS EVIDENCE—No. C-10-02181 RMW ALG 1 makes no allegation that Zeng is otherwise located more than 100 miles away or unavailable to 2 testify under any other exception in Rule 32(a)(4). Accordingly, the court denies plantiff's request to 3 offer her deposition testimony at trial in leiu of her presence. 4 5 DATED: March 20, 2013 6 7 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RULINGS ON PLAINTIFF'S OFFER OF DEPOSITION AND DISCOVERY RESPONSES AS EVIDENCE—No. C-10-02181 RMW ALG 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?