Dang v. Sutter's Place, Inc. et al

Filing 81

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT MENTAL EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF re 79 Stipulation filed by Cuc Dang. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on January 20, 2012. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 4 ANN A. NGUYEN (SBN 178712) ROBINSON & WOOD, INC. 227 N. First Street San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: 408-298-7120 Facsimile: 408-298-0477 Email: aan@robinsonwood.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff DANG 2 3 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 9 CUC DANG, Plaintiff, 10 11 vs. AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT MENTAL EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF SUTTER’S PLACE, INC. dba BAY 101 or BAY 101 CASINO, et. al., [Fed. R. Civ. P. 35] 12 13 14 15 Case No. 10-CV-02181 (RMW) (PSG) Defendants. Complaint Filed: May 20, 2010 16 17 18 On December 12, 2011, the Court issued an Order based upon a December 9, 2011 19 Stipulation submitted by Plaintiff and Defendant for an independent mental examination of 20 Plaintiff to take place on January 24, 2012. Plaintiff has just received notice that her appearance 21 at a Naturalization Oath Ceremony is required on January 24, 2012 to complete her 22 naturalization process to become a US citizen. To permit Plaintiff to attend the Naturalization 23 Oath Ceremony, the parties have agreed to continue Plaintiff's IME for three (3) days. In order 24 to avoid prejudice to Defendant for this brief continuance, the parties have also agreed to 25 continue the trial deadlines pertaining to expert discovery. 26 27 Accordingly, Plaintiff, Cuc Dang (“Dang”), and defendant, Sutter’s Place, Inc. dba Bay 101 (“Bay 101”) (collectively “the parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, 28 717412 1 AMENDED STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT MENTAL EXAM OF PLAINTIFF; CASE NO. 10-CV-02181 (RMW) (PSG) 1 hereby submit this amended stipulation with respect to the time, place, manner, conditions, 2 examiner and scope of examination for an independent mental examination of Dang. A separate 3 stipulation and proposed order will be submitted with respect to the continuance of trial 4 deadlines pertaining to expert discovery. 5 1. Dang has placed her mental condition in controversy. In her First Amended 6 Complaint (“FAC”), Dang alleges that as a result “of the harassment and unfair treatment she 7 suffered [at Bay 101], plaintiff became severely distressed and depressed[,] … was forced to 8 seek medical treatment for the severe stress and depression, and was placed on medical disability 9 for several weeks.” (FAC, ¶ 26). Dang further alleges that “[a]s a direct, foreseeable, and 10 proximate result of Bay 101’s discriminatory acts, [she] has suffered, and continues to suffer, … 11 humiliation, embarrassment, severe mental and emotional distress, and discomfort[.]” (FAC, ¶¶ 12 56, 63, 71, 77, 83, and 90). 13 14 15 2. To date, Dang continues to receive treatment for the stress and depression she is claiming in this litigation. 3. Good cause exists for an independent mental exam (“IME”). Dang’s FAC and 16 deposition testimony both allege that Dang has suffered, and continues to suffer, from emotional 17 distress as a result of the conduct at Bay 101 as alleged in her FAC. 18 4. The IME will be conducted by Dr. Mark Lipian, M.D., Ph.D., on Friday, 19 January 27, 2012, at his office in San Francisco located at 50 California Street, Suite 1500, San 20 Francisco, California 94111, (415) 477-9330. The IME will begin at 9:00 a.m. and will end no 21 later than 5:00 p.m., including meal and rest breaks. However, if Dang is not present at the IME 22 by 9:00 a.m., then the IME will end eight (8) hours from its starting time, including meal and rest 23 breaks. Dr. Lipian will audio record the IME. 24 25 26 5. Also present at the IME will be a certified Vietnamese interpreter for Dang. No one else shall be allowed in the examination. 6. Dr. Lipian practices psychiatry and forensic psychiatry in Los Angeles, San 27 Francisco and Newport Beach, California. He serves as the Chief of Psychiatry, Forensic 28 Outpatient Services, for the Orange County Health Care Agency, and is the Medical Director of 717412 2 AMENDED STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT MENTAL EXAM OF PLAINTIFF; CASE NO. 10-CV-02181 (RMW) (PSG) 1 the Conditional Release Program of Orange County. He has served as an Assistant Clinical 2 Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at UCLA since 1991 3 where he teaches clinical and forensic psychiatry to residents and postgraduate fellows in 4 Forensic Psychiatry. Dr. Lipian is licensed to practice medicine in the State of California, and is 5 Board Certified in both Psychiatry and Forensic Psychiatry by the American Board of Psychiatry 6 and Neurology. 7 7. The scope of Dr. Lipian's examination shall be limited as set forth in Paragraphs 8 7, 8 and 9 below. Dr. Lipian will conduct a forensic psychiatric evaluation of Dang so as to 9 evaluate the nature and extent of Dang’s mental and emotional distress if any, and the cause(s) 10 thereof, together with whether Dang’s past experiences or psychological conditions provide an 11 explanation for Dang’s perception of disputed fact allegations or an explanation for the mental 12 and emotional distress she claims to have suffered. Dr. Lipian will conduct a standard forensic 13 psychiatric examination which consists of a one-day interview with Dang where he will ask 14 Dang general open-ended questions about her medical and mental history and the possible 15 sources of any alleged emotional trauma. 16 8. Dr. Lipian’s exam will include a review of Dang’s medical and mental health 17 history. Dr. Lipian must determine, for example, whether Dang suffered from prior traumas (in 18 the form of injuries, diseases, or life events) that may bear on her current mental state. He must 19 determine whether Dang is taking, or has taken, any medications that might have produced 20 relevant side effects. He must determine how Dang has coped with any significant stressors in 21 the past and whether and to what extent her current condition differs from past stressors; and he 22 must determine whether Dang suffers from a psychotic and/or personality disorder, its extent and 23 prognosis, that may bear upon Dang’s mental state and capacity at the time of events at issue and 24 its possible impact upon those events, as well as upon her present mental state and capacity. Dr. 25 Lipian must also determine the interrelationship, if any, between psychiatric condition and 26 physical complaints; and which, if either, preceded, caused, underlay, or resulted from the other 27 in this case. From a psychiatric standpoint, all of these areas of inquiry relate to Dang’s mental 28 condition. 717412 3 AMENDED STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT MENTAL EXAM OF PLAINTIFF; CASE NO. 10-CV-02181 (RMW) (PSG) 1 9. Dr. Lipian does not intend to administer any “paper and pencil” tests to Dang, but 2 reserves the right to do so if indicated by initial results of the examination. He will not 3 administer any physically painful tests to Dang or perform any invasive procedures. He plans to 4 conduct an interview consisting of open-ended questions about the subjects listed above. If 5 Dang inadvertently reveals any protected attorney-client communications during the course of 6 the examination, such disclosures will not be deemed as a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. 7 10. Dang hereby designates the audio recording of the IME and Dr. Lipian’s Rule 8 35(b) report as “Confidential” pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order. Bay 101 does not 9 waive its right to challenge the “Confidential” designation as permitted by Section 6 of the 10 11 Stipulated Protective Order. 11. A copy of the audio recording shall be provided to Dang’s counsel within fifteen 12 (15) days of the examination. A copy of Dr. Lipian’s Rule 35(b) report shall be provided to 13 Dang’s counsel within five (5) days of its receipt by Bay 101’s counsel. 14 15 12. Dr. Lipian has been provided with the Protective Order for this litigation and has signed the Acknowledgment and Agreement To Be Bound by said Protective Order. 16 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 18 19 [In accordance with General Order 45.X.B., Ann Nguyen, counsel for Plaintiff, attests that 20 Defendant's counsel, Matthew Schechter, has concurred in this filing.] 21 22 Dated: January 11, 2012 McMANIS FAULKNER 23 /s/ MATTHEW SCHECHTER Attorneys for Defendant SUTTER’S PLACE, INC. dba BAY 101 24 25 26 27 28 717412 4 AMENDED STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT MENTAL EXAM OF PLAINTIFF; CASE NO. 10-CV-02181 (RMW) (PSG) 1 Dated: January 11, 2012 ROBINSON & WOOD, INC. 2 /s/ ANN A. NGUYEN Attorneys for Plaintiff, CUC DANG 3 4 5 6 ORDER 7 Good cause appearing therefor, an independent mental exam of Cuc Dang may be 8 conducted by Dr. Mark Lipian, with the assistance of a certified Vietnamese interpreter, on 9 Friday, January 27, 2012, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 50 California Street, Suite 1500, San 10 Francisco, California 94111, according to the manner, conditions and scope of examination as set 11 forth in the above stipulation. 12 13 14 Dated: ________________________ 1/20/2012 _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 717412 5 AMENDED STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT MENTAL EXAM OF PLAINTIFF; CASE NO. 10-CV-02181 (RMW) (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?