Pinheiro v. Acxiom Corporation et al

Filing 75

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT RE DEFENDANT AEROTEK, INC.; ORDER SETTING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Dismissal re Aerotek, Inc. due by 9/16/2011. If dismissal not filed by that date, then Show Cause Response due by 9/20/2011 and Show Caus e Hearing set for 9/27/2011 01:30 PM. As for plaintiff and remaining defendants, further case management conference set for 9/27/2011, 1:30 PM to discuss dates for final pretrial conference and trial. Joint case management statement due by 9/20/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/11/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2011)

1
2

*E-FILED 08-11-2011*

3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

7

12

CARLA PINHEIRO, individually and on behalf
of all similarly situated individuals,

13

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
SETTLEMENT RE DEFENDANT
AEROTEK, INC.

Plaintiff,
v.

14
15
16

ACXIOM CORPORATION; AEROTEK, INC.;
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS CLINICAL
LABORATORIES, INC.; and DOES 1 through
200, inclusive,

17

No. C10-02246 HRL

ORDER SETTING FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Defendants.
/

18
19

Plaintiff and defendant Aerotek Inc. (Aerotek) advise that they have reached a

20

settlement. Accordingly, all previously scheduled deadlines and appearances are vacated as to

21

Aerotek.

22

On or before September 16, 2011, plaintiff and Aerotek shall file a stipulation of

23

dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a). If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date,

24

plaintiff and Aerotek shall appear in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor of the United States District Court,

25

280 South First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 on September 27, 2011, 1:30 p.m. and show cause,

26

if any, why the claims against Aerotek should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a).

27

Plaintiff and Aerotek shall file a statement in response to this Order to Show Cause no later

28

than September 20, 2011. The joint statement shall state (1) the status of the activities of the

1

parties in finalizing settlement; and (2) how much additional time, if any, is requested to finalize

2

the settlement and file the dismissal. If a voluntary dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to

3

Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated and the parties need not file a joint statement

4

in response to this Order.

5

As for plaintiff and the remaining defendants, a further case management conference is

6

set for September 27, 2011, 1:30 p.m. to discuss dates for a final pretrial conference and trial.

7

A joint case management statement shall be filed no later than September 20, 2011.

8

SO ORDERED.

9

Dated: August 11, 2011
________________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD

10

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1

5:10-cv-02246-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

2

Alison Marie Miceli

3

Alison P. Danaceau [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail]

[e-mail]

4
Brooke Lewis

[e-mail]

5
Caroline McIntyre

[e-mail], [e-mail]

Daniel J. Bergeson

[e-mail], [e-mail]

John S. Battenfeld

[e-mail], [e-mail]

6
7
8
Jonathan Morris Brenner

[e-mail]

9
Julie Wong

[e-mail], [e-mail]

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
Michael James Grace [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]

12

Shweta Gera

13

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have
not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

[e-mail], [e-mail]

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3