"In Re: Facebook Privacy Litigation"

Filing 99

STIPULATION re 96 MOTION to Dismiss FACEBOOK, INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Regarding Briefing Schedule For Motion To Dismiss First Amended Consolidated Complaint (Civil Local Rule 6-1(B)) by Facebook, Inc.. (Brown, Matthew) (Filed on 7/19/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127)
([e-mail])
MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972)
([e-mail])
BENJAMIN H. KLEINE (257225)
([e-mail])
KELLY A. COOKE (258003)
([e-mail])
MEGAN L. DONOHUE (266147)
([e-mail])
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.
ASCHENBRENER LAW, P.C.
MICHAEL J. ASCHENBRENER (277114)
([e-mail])
10 S Riverside Plaza, Suite 1800
Chicago, IL 60606
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
(Additional counsel for Plaintiffs listed on signature page)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

20
21
22

IN RE: FACEBOOK PRIVACY
LITIGATION

Case No. 10-cv-02389-JW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT (CIVIL
LOCAL RULE 6-1(B))

23
24
25

ACTION FILED: May 28, 2010

26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
NO. 10-CV-02389-JW

1

This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiffs David Gould and Mike Robertson

2

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) (Plaintiffs and Facebook

3

collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel.

4
5

WHEREAS on May 12, 2011 this Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Complaint
with leave to amend certain causes of action;

6
7

WHEREAS on June 13, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Consolidated Class Action
Complaint (“First Amended Complaint”);

8
9

WHEREAS on July 15, 2011, Facebook filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended
Complaint (“Motion”);

10

WHEREAS the first available hearing date for the Motion is October 3, 2011;

11

WHEREAS under Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), the Parties may, by written stipulation, request

12

a Court order extending the time for Plaintiffs’ Opposition to and Facebook’s Reply in support of

13

the Motion;

14

WHEREAS extending the deadlines for Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Motion to August 11,

15

2011 and for Facebook’s Reply in support of the Motion to September 1, 2011 will not alter the

16

date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order or affect any scheduling for the case

17

other than the dates of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to and Facebook’s Reply in support of the Motion;

18

AND

19

WHEREAS this brief extension of time will enable the Parties to provide better and more

20

helpful briefing to the Court without affecting the hearing date on the Motion, the Court’s

21

preparation time in the weeks before the hearing, or any other aspect of the case schedule;

22

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree, subject to approval by the

23

Court, as follows:

24

1.

25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

The deadline for Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss the First

Amended Complaint is extended to and including August 11, 2011; and
2.

The deadline for Facebook’s Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss the First

Amended Complaint is extended to and including September 1, 2011.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
NO. 10-CV-02389-JW

1

Dated: July 19, 2011

2

COOLEY LLP
/s/ Matthew D. Brown
____________________________________
Matthew D. Brown (196972)
Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC.

3
4
5

Dated: July 19, 2011

6

ASCHENBRENER LAW, P.C.
/s/ Michael J. Aschenbrener
____________________________________
Michael J. Aschenbrener (277114)
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Dated: July 19, 2011

NASSIRI & JUNG LLP
/s/ Kassra P. Nassiri
____________________________________
Kassra P. Nassiri (215405)
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

NASSIRI & JUNG LLP
KASSRA P. NASSIRI (215405)
([e-mail])
CHARLES H. JUNG (217909)
([e-mail])
47 Kearney Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP
SEAN REIS (184044)
([e-mail])
30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

25

EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP
JAY EDELSON
([e-mail])
BENJAMIN HARRIS RICHMAN (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
350 North LaSalle Street, 13th Floor
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

26

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

21
22
23
24

27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

3.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
NO. 10-CV-02389-JW

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

DATED:________________, 2011

____________________________________
HON. JAMES WARE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that

11

all signatories have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding

12

Briefing Schedule for Motion to Dismiss First Amended Consolidated Complaint.

13

Dated: July 19, 2011

COOLEY LLP

14
15

/s/ Matthew D. Brown
____________________________
Matthew D. Brown (196972)

16
17
18
19

1227741 /SF

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

4.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
NO. 10-CV-02389-JW