Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Polanco et al

Filing 28

ORDER re 27 Parties' Proposed Form of Protective Order. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 9/29/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 9/29/2010)

Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Polanco et al

Doc. 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 On September 27, 2010, the parties submitted a proposed form of stipulated protective order. 18 19 spend time identifying all of the problems with the proposed form of order, the court finds it more 20 efficient to direct the parties to use the one of the court's model forms of protective order. 21 Therefore, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than October 15, 2010, the parties shall submit a 23 revised form of protective order based on one of the court's model forms of protective order 24 available in the "Forms" section of the court's website (www.cand.uscourts.gov). If the parties 25 believe that modification of the court's model form of order is reasonably necessary for the present 26 action, they shall also submit a joint brief explaining what modification they seek, and why it is 27 28 For example, Paragraph 2 fails to restrict confidentiality designations to information that qualifies for protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. OR D E R, page 1
Dockets.Justia.com
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.,

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DAVID POLANCO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )

Case No.: C 10-2390 RMW (PVT) ORDER RE PARTIES' PROPOSED FORM OF PROTECTIVE ORDER

Some of the provisions of the proposed form of order are not acceptable to the court.1 Rather than

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

reasonably necessary for the present action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending entry of the final form of protective order, the handling of confidential information shall be governed by the provisions of the court's model "Stipulated Protective Order for Litigation Involving Patents, Highly Sensitive Confidential Information And/or Trade Secrets." Dated: 9/29/10 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Magistrate Judge

OR D E R, page 2