Robertson v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES AS MODIFIED re (19 in 5:10-cv-02389-JW) Stipulation, (12 in 5:10-cv-02408-JW) Stipulation. As it was first filed, Case No. C 10-02389-JW will be the lead case for consolidation. All future filings shall bear the caption: In Re: Facebook Privacy Litigation. In light of this Order, the Clerk of Court shall immediately close Case No. C 10-02408- JW. ***CMC Deadlines terminated. ***Set/Reset CMC Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/17/2010. Case Management Conference set for 9/27/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/20/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2010)

Download PDF
Robertson v. Facebook, Inc. Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 David Gould, et al., / Mike Robertson, et al., v. Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 10-02389 JW NO. C 10-02408 JW ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES AS MODIFIED United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Facebook, Inc., Defendant. / Presently before the Court is a Stipulation by all parties for a Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Consolidated.1 The parties seek the Court's determination as to whether Robertson, et al. v. Facebook, Inc., Case No. C 10-02408-JW, should be consolidated with Gould, et al. v. Facebook, Inc., Case No. C 10-02389-JW. Plaintiffs contend that the cases should be consolidated in the interests of judicial and party economy, because both cases involve similar complaints and common questions of law and fact. (Stipulation at 1.) Upon review, the Court finds good cause to adopt the parties' Stipulation, as modified: (1) The Court finds good cause to consolidate the cases in the interests of efficiency, in light of the fact that they share substantial common issues of fact and legal theories. (See Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Consolidating Cases For All Purposes, Allowing for the Filing of a Consolidated Complaint, Setting a Case Management Conference for October 25, 2010, and Appointing Lead Counsel, hereafter, "Stipulation," C 10-02389-JW, Docket Item No. 22.) 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (2) As it was first filed, Case No. C 10-02389-JW will be the lead case for consolidation. All future filings shall bear the caption: "In Re: Facebook Privacy Litigation." In light of this Order, the Clerk of Court shall immediately close Case No. C 10-02408JW. The Court sets September 27, 2010 at 10 a.m. for a Case Management Conference for the consolidated action. On or before September 17, 2010, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and Civ. L.R. 1619. The Statement shall include, among other things, a good faith discovery plan with a proposed date for close of all discovery. The parties shall also address whether discovery should be bifurcated between class and merits. (3) At this time, the Court finds the parties' Stipulation with respect to the appointment of co-lead counsel sufficient. However, the Court reserves the right to modify appointment of counsel in the event that the nature of the case necessitates alteration of appointment. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 20, 2010 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Charles Hyunchul Jung cjung@nassiri-jung.com Kassra Powell Nassiri knassiri@nassiri-jung.com Matthew Dean Brown mbrown@cooley.com Benjamin Harris Richman brichman@edelson.com Jay Edelson jedelson@edelson.com Michael James Aschenbrener maschenbrener@edelson.com Sean Patrick Reis sreis@edelson.com Dated: August 20, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?