UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Kang et al

Filing 16

ORDER Continuing Initial Case Management Conference. Initial case management conference continued to 1/11/2011, 1:30 PM. Updated joint case management statement due by 1/4/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/3/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2010)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Kang et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, No. C10-02434 HRL ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE *E-FILED 11-03-2010* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEONG H. KANG and INHWA L. KANG (aka INHAVA L. KANG), Defendants. / Having reviewed the parties' Joint Case Management Statement, and based upon their representations that settlement of this action is imminent, the initial case management conference is continued to January 11, 2011, 1:30 p.m. The parties shall file an updated joint case management statement by January 4, 2011. Assuming the matter does not settle by December 31, 2010 (as anticipated), the parties are advised that the court is disinclined to continue the case management conference any further unless they can show good cause why more time reasonably is needed to finalize the settlement. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 3, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5:10-cv-02434-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: Eric James Adams Kathryn S. Diemer eric.adams@sba.gov kdiemer@diemerwhitman.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?