J.H. et al v. Baldovinos et al

Filing 172

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting (73) Motion to Relate Case in case 5:10-cv-05797-LHK. This case will be related to and consolidated with case 11-cv-01013.(Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Mailing) (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2011)

Download PDF
J.H. et al v. Baldovinos et al Doc. 172 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 10-CV-05797-LHK ORDER RELATING AND CONSOLIDATING CASES Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION BELINDA K., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 10-CV-05797-LHK ORDER RELATING AND CONSOLIDATING CASES Plaintiff in the above-captioned case filed an identical complaint in the Superior Court for the County of Alameda. This case was removed to federal court by Defendants and now bears case number 11-cv-01013-SBA. This matter is pending before Judge Armstrong. Plaintiff has moved to relate this case to the above-captioned case, case no. 10-cv-05797-LHK. Because the complaint in case number 11-cv-01013-SBA is identical to the one pending in the above-captioned case, the Court finds that this case should be related to and consolidated with the above-captioned case. Accordingly, the two cases will proceed as one action in case number 10-cv-05797-LHK. Case number 10-cv-05797-LHK is already related to another case pending before this Court, number 10cv-02507-LHK, titled Belinda K. and J. H. v. Baldovinos, et al. Therefore, when case number 11cv-01013-SBA is consolidated with case number 10-cv-05797-LHK, the consolidated matters will be related to case number 10-cv-02507-LHK. 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 6, 2011 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 10-CV-05797-LHK ORDER RELATING AND CONSOLIDATING CASES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?