J.H. et al v. Baldovinos et al
Filing
282
Order re: Administrate Matters by Hon. Lucy H. Koh (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
BELINDA K. and J.H., her minor son,
13
14
15
16
Petitioners,
v.
YOLANDA BALDOVINOS, et al.,
Respondents.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 10-CV-02507-LHK
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE
MATTERS
On February 8, 2013, the Court received two CDs filed by Belinda K., entitled “Calico
19
Interview: 12-20-2006” and “Belinda K. Appeals.” This Court no longer has jurisdiction over this
20
case, as it is currently pending on appeal. As such, the Court will not review these submissions.
21
Because the Calico Interview is an interview with a minor about confidential allegations, the Court
22
will keep these submissions under seal.
23
In an Administrative Motion filed on February 26, 2013, ECF No. 280, Respondents
24
County of Alameda and Yolanda Baldovinos requested copies of endorsed-filed, unredacted
25
versions of several documents that the parties had filed with the District Court.
26
27
With the exception of the Notice of Appeal, the requested documents were filed under seal.
In preparing for the appeal filed by Petitioner/Appellant Belinda K. (Ninth Circuit Appellate #12-
28
1
Case No.: 10-CV-02507-LHK
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
1
15372), Respondents have discovered that they do not have endorsed-filed, unredacted copies of
2
the above documents, which they intend to submit to the Ninth Circuit as Excerpts of Record per
3
Ninth Circuit Rule 30-1. See ECF No. 280. Respondents’ counsel submits that these documents
4
are necessary to the above-referenced appeal.
5
The Court hereby GRANTS Respondents’ motion as to the requested documents that were
6
filed on ECF: the Notice of Appeal (Docket #250), and the Summary Judgment Order (Docket
7
#233). 1 The Clerk’s office shall provide Respondents with copies of these documents.
8
The Clerk’s office shall also provide Respondents with redacted copies of the Declarations
9
and attached exhibits of the following declarations Respondents filed in support of Respondents’
10
Motion for Summary Judgment: Declaration of James Crawford-Jakubiak, M.D.; Declaration of
11
Jeri Issacson; Declaration of Linda Fuchs; and Declaration of Marry Ellyn Gormley. Because
12
copies of the remaining documents are currently unavailable, the Court DENIES Respondents’
13
motion with respect to these documents.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
Dated: May 6, 2013
16
17
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
27
28
The Court notes that it has previously granted Petitioner’s request for a second unredacted copy of
the Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Granting Respondents’ Motion
for Summary Judgment (“Summary Judgment Order”), after Petitioner had difficulty obtaining the
original from her former counsel. See ECF No. 271, n.1.
2
Case No.: 10-CV-02507-LHK
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?