J.H. et al v. Baldovinos et al

Filing 282

Order re: Administrate Matters by Hon. Lucy H. Koh (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12

BELINDA K. and J.H., her minor son,

13
14
15
16

Petitioners,
v.
YOLANDA BALDOVINOS, et al.,
Respondents.

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 10-CV-02507-LHK
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE
MATTERS

On February 8, 2013, the Court received two CDs filed by Belinda K., entitled “Calico

19

Interview: 12-20-2006” and “Belinda K. Appeals.” This Court no longer has jurisdiction over this

20

case, as it is currently pending on appeal. As such, the Court will not review these submissions.

21

Because the Calico Interview is an interview with a minor about confidential allegations, the Court

22

will keep these submissions under seal.

23

In an Administrative Motion filed on February 26, 2013, ECF No. 280, Respondents

24

County of Alameda and Yolanda Baldovinos requested copies of endorsed-filed, unredacted

25

versions of several documents that the parties had filed with the District Court.

26
27

With the exception of the Notice of Appeal, the requested documents were filed under seal.
In preparing for the appeal filed by Petitioner/Appellant Belinda K. (Ninth Circuit Appellate #12-

28
1
Case No.: 10-CV-02507-LHK
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

1

15372), Respondents have discovered that they do not have endorsed-filed, unredacted copies of

2
the above documents, which they intend to submit to the Ninth Circuit as Excerpts of Record per
3
Ninth Circuit Rule 30-1. See ECF No. 280. Respondents’ counsel submits that these documents
4
are necessary to the above-referenced appeal.
5
The Court hereby GRANTS Respondents’ motion as to the requested documents that were
6
filed on ECF: the Notice of Appeal (Docket #250), and the Summary Judgment Order (Docket
7

#233). 1 The Clerk’s office shall provide Respondents with copies of these documents.

8
The Clerk’s office shall also provide Respondents with redacted copies of the Declarations
9
and attached exhibits of the following declarations Respondents filed in support of Respondents’
10
Motion for Summary Judgment: Declaration of James Crawford-Jakubiak, M.D.; Declaration of
11
Jeri Issacson; Declaration of Linda Fuchs; and Declaration of Marry Ellyn Gormley. Because
12
copies of the remaining documents are currently unavailable, the Court DENIES Respondents’
13
motion with respect to these documents.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
Dated: May 6, 2013
16
17

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1

27
28

The Court notes that it has previously granted Petitioner’s request for a second unredacted copy of
the Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Granting Respondents’ Motion
for Summary Judgment (“Summary Judgment Order”), after Petitioner had difficulty obtaining the
original from her former counsel. See ECF No. 271, n.1.
2
Case No.: 10-CV-02507-LHK
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS