J.H. et al v. Baldovinos et al

Filing 284

ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on August 9, 2013. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12

BELINDA K. and J.H., her minor son,

13
14
15

Petitioners,
v.
YOLANDA BALDOVINOS, et al.,
Respondents.

16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 10-CV-02507-LHK
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE
MATTERS

18

In an Administrative Motion filed on February 26, 2013, ECF No. 280, Respondents

19

County of Alameda and Yolanda Baldovinos requested copies of endorsed-filed, unredacted

20

versions of several documents that the parties had filed with the District Court.

21

The Court previously granted Respondents’ Motion as to the documents which had been

22

filed on ECF: the Notice of Appeal (Docket #250), and the Summary Judgment Order (Docket

23

#233). ECF No. 282.

24

The Court now GRANTS Respondents’ Motion as to the following requested declarations

25

and the exhibits attached to those declarations which were originally filed in support of

26

Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and were resubmitted under seal with the parties’

27
28
1
Case No.: 10-CV-02507-LHK
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

1
2

Joint Motion for Administrative Relief to File Certain Documents Under Seal on January 20, 2012,
ECF No. 2231:

3
1.

Declaration and attached exhibits of James Crawford-Jakubiak, M.D.;

2.

Declaration and attached exhibits of Geri Isaacson;

3.

Declaration and attached exhibits of Linda Fuchs;

4.

Declaration and attached exhibits of Mary Ellyn Gormley;

5.

Declaration and attached exhibits of Rhonda Malone.

6.

Additionally, the Court GRANTS Respondents’ request for the declaration and

4
5
6
7
8
9
attached exhibit of Michelle Love. Respondents requested the declaration of Michelle Love in
10
support of Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment. However, the declaration of Michelle
11
Love that was filed with this Court and referenced in the Court’s Summary Judgment Order, ECF
12
No. 233, at 7, was filed in support of Respondents’ Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion for Summary
13
Judgment. The Court interprets Respondents’ request as a request for this document.
14

The Court’s copies are neither endorsed-filed nor stamped “Chambers Copy.” However,

15
the Court’s copies are copies of the signed declarations which the Court reviewed in ruling on the
16
parties’ respective Motions for Summary Judgment.
17
The Clerk’s office shall provide Respondents with copies of these documents.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: August 9, 2013
21
22

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The Court notes that the parties failed to comply with this Court’s Civil Standing Order
Regarding Motions to File Under Seal, which requires that a party seeking to file documents under
seal must also publicly e-file, as an exhibit to the administrative motion to file under seal, a
proposed public redacted version of the documents that the party is seeking to seal. The parties did
not e-file redacted copies of these documents.
2
Case No.: 10-CV-02507-LHK
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS