Wesblatt v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 126

STIPULATION AND ORDER 125 Extending Apple's Time to Respond to First Amended Master Consolidated Complaint. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/20/2011. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607)
([e-mail])
ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694)
([e-mail])
STUART C. PLUNKETT (CA SBN 187971)
([e-mail])
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
Case Nos. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW

13
14

In re Apple and AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan
Litigation

CLASS ACTION

17

STIPULATION AND []
ORDER EXTENDING APPLE’S
TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED MASTER
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

18

The Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

19

[N.D. Cal. Civil L.R.6-1]

15
ALL CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS
16

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
sf-3058372

1

Plaintiffs Adam Weisblatt, Joe Hanna, David Turk and Colette Osetek (“plaintiffs”) and

2

Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as

3

follows:

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

WHEREAS, on August 8, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Master Consolidated
Complaint (“FAMCC”) in the above-captioned case;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, Apple’s response to the FAMCC would
be due October 21, 2011 (Dkt. No. 116);
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple are in the process of mediating this dispute with the
Hon. Daniel Weinstein (Ret.) and Catherine A. Yanni, Esq. of JAMS;
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple have made substantial progress toward a possible
resolution;
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple agree to extend Apple’s time to respond to the FAMCC
to permit additional time for mediation discussions;
WHEREAS, the stipulated extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline
already fixed by the Court;
THEREFORE, plaintiffs and Apple stipulate that Apple’s time to respond is extended by
30 days, until November 21, 2011.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

19
20
21
22

Dated: October 17, 2011

MICHAEL W. SOBOL
ROGER N. HELLER
ALLISON ELGART
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP

23
24

By:

/s/ Michael W. Sobol
MICHAEL W. SOBOL

25
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
sf-3058372

1

1

Dated: October 17, 2011

2

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS
ANDREW D. MUHLBACH
STUART C. PLUNKETT
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

3
4
By:
5
6

/s/ Penelope A. Preovolos
PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

7
8
9
10
11

I, Penelope A. Preovolos, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file
this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that I have on
file the concurrences for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this
efiled document.

12

By:

13

/s/ Penelope A. Preovolos
Penelope A. Preovolos

14
15
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18
19
20

Date:
_______________________________
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
sf-3058372

2