Wesblatt v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 127

STIPULATION AND ORDER 125 Extending Apple's Time to Respond to First Amended Master Consolidated Complaint. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/20/11. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607) (PPreovolos@mofo.com) ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694) (AMuhlbach@mofo.com) STUART C. PLUNKETT (CA SBN 187971) (SPlunkett@mofo.com) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 Case Nos. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW 13 14 In re Apple and AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan Litigation CLASS ACTION 17 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER EXTENDING APPLE’S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED MASTER CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT 18 The Hon. Ronald M. Whyte 19 [N.D. Cal. Civil L.R.6-1] 15 ALL CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW sf-3058372 1 Plaintiffs Adam Weisblatt, Joe Hanna, David Turk and Colette Osetek (“plaintiffs”) and 2 Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as 3 follows: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 WHEREAS, on August 8, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Master Consolidated Complaint (“FAMCC”) in the above-captioned case; WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, Apple’s response to the FAMCC would be due October 21, 2011 (Dkt. No. 116); WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple are in the process of mediating this dispute with the Hon. Daniel Weinstein (Ret.) and Catherine A. Yanni, Esq. of JAMS; WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple have made substantial progress toward a possible resolution; WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple agree to extend Apple’s time to respond to the FAMCC to permit additional time for mediation discussions; WHEREAS, the stipulated extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by the Court; THEREFORE, plaintiffs and Apple stipulate that Apple’s time to respond is extended by 30 days, until November 21, 2011. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 19 20 21 22 Dated: October 17, 2011 MICHAEL W. SOBOL ROGER N. HELLER ALLISON ELGART LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 23 24 By: /s/ Michael W. Sobol MICHAEL W. SOBOL 25 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW sf-3058372 1 1 Dated: October 17, 2011 2 PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS ANDREW D. MUHLBACH STUART C. PLUNKETT MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 3 4 By: 5 6 /s/ Penelope A. Preovolos PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 7 8 9 10 11 I, Penelope A. Preovolos, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that I have on file the concurrences for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this efiled document. 12 By: 13 /s/ Penelope A. Preovolos Penelope A. Preovolos 14 15 16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 20 Date: _______________________________ Hon. Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW sf-3058372 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?