Wesblatt v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 136

STIPULATION AND ORDER 135 Extending Apple's Time to Respond to First Amended Master Consolidated Complaint. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/6/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607)
([e-mail])
ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694)
([e-mail])
STUART C. PLUNKETT (CA SBN 187971)
([e-mail])
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
13
14

Case Nos. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
In re Apple and AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan
Litigation

15

CLASS ACTION

17

STIPULATION AND []
ORDER EXTENDING APPLE’S
TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED MASTER
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

18

The Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

19

[N.D. Cal. Civil L.R.6-1]

ALL CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS
16

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
sf-3109118

1

Plaintiffs Adam Weisblatt, Joe Hanna, David Turk and Colette Osetek (“plaintiffs”) and

2

Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as

3

follows:

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

WHEREAS, on August 8, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Master Consolidated
Complaint (“FAMCC”) in the above-captioned case;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, Apple’s response to the FAMCC would
be due February 28, 2012 (Dkt. No. 126);
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple are in the process of mediating this dispute with the
Hon. Daniel Weinstein (Ret.) and Catherine A. Yanni, Esq. of JAMS;
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple have made substantial progress toward a possible
resolution;
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple agree to extend Apple’s time to respond to the FAMCC
to permit additional time for mediation discussions;
WHEREAS, the stipulated extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline
already fixed by the Court;
THEREFORE, plaintiffs and Apple stipulate that Apple’s time to respond is extended
until March 29, 2012.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

19
20
21
22

Dated: February 27, 2012

MICHAEL W. SOBOL
ROGER N. HELLER
ALLISON ELGART
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP

23
24
25

By:

/s/ Michael W. Sobol
MICHAEL W. SOBOL
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
sf-3109118

1

1

Dated: February 27, 2012

2

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS
ANDREW D. MUHLBACH
STUART C. PLUNKETT
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

3
4
By:
5
6

/s/ Penelope A. Preovolos
PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

7
8
9
10
11

I, Penelope A. Preovolos, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file
this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that I have on
file the concurrences for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this
efiled document.

12

By:

13

/s/ Penelope A. Preovolos
Penelope A. Preovolos

14
15
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18
19
20

Date:
_______________________________
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
sf-3109118

2