Wesblatt v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 166

Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte granting 165 Stipulation (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
Case Nos. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
13

In re Apple and AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan
Litigation

CLASS ACTION

14
15
16

ALL CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
EXTENDING APPLE’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
MASTER CONSOLIDATED
COMPLAINT

17
The Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
18
[N.D. Cal. Civil L.R.6-1]
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
sf-3242369

1
2

Plaintiffs Adam Weisblatt, Joe Hanna, David Turk and Colette Osetek (“plaintiffs”) and

3

Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as

4

follows:

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

WHEREAS, on August 8, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Master Consolidated
Complaint (“FAMCC”) in the above-captioned case;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, Apple’s response to the FAMCC would
be due April 1, 2013;
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple are engaged in productive settlement discussions and
have made substantial progress towards resolving this matter;
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple agree to extend Apple’s time to respond to the FAMCC
to permit additional time for settlement discussions;
WHEREAS, the stipulated extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline
already fixed by the Court;
THEREFORE, plaintiffs and Apple stipulate that Apple’s time to respond is extended
until May 1, 2013.

17

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

18

[THE COURT FURTHER NOTES: The court has been very lenient in allowing

19

extensions up until this time, but the court will not grant any further stipulated extensions

20

without a more detailed showing from the parties.]

21
22
23
24

Dated: March 28, 2013

MICHAEL W. SOBOL
ROGER N. HELLER
ALLISON ELGART
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP

25
26
27

By:

/s/ Michael W. Sobol
MICHAEL W. SOBOL
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

28

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
sf-3242369

1

1
2

Dated: March 28, 2013

3

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS
ANDREW D. MUHLBACH
STUART C. PLUNKETT
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

4
5

By:

6

/s/ Penelope A. Preovolos
PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

7
8
9
10
11

I, Penelope A. Preovolos, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file
this Stipulation. I hereby attest that I have on file the concurrences for any signatures indicated
by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this efiled document.

12
By:
13

/s/ Penelope A. Preovolos
Penelope A. Preovolos

14
15
16
17

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
Date: ____________________
April 9, 2013
19
20

_______________________________
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
sf-3242369

2