Wesblatt v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 170

STIPULATION AND ORDER 168 Extending Apple's Time to Respond to First Amended Master Consolidated Complaint. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 5/9/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607)
([e-mail])
ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694)
([e-mail])
STUART C. PLUNKETT (CA SBN 187971)
([e-mail])
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
Case Nos. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW

13
14

In re Apple and AT&T iPad Unlimited Data Plan
Litigation

CLASS ACTION

17

STIPULATION AND []
ORDER EXTENDING APPLE’S
TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED MASTER
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

18

The Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

19

[N.D. Cal. Civil L.R.6-1]

15
ALL CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS
16

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
sf-3242369

1

Plaintiffs Adam Weisblatt, Joe Hanna, David Turk and Colette Osetek (“plaintiffs”) and

2

Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as

3

follows:

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

WHEREAS, on August 8, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Master Consolidated
Complaint (“FAMCC”) in the above-captioned case;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, Apple’s response to the FAMCC would
be due May 1, 2013;
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple are engaged in productive settlement discussions and
have made substantial progress towards resolving this matter;
WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a further Case Management Conference in this
matter for June 21, 2013;
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Apple agree to extend Apple’s time to respond to the FAMCC

13

to permit additional time for settlement discussions, and the Court indicated, at a Case

14

Management Conference held in this matter on April 26, 2013, that an extension through and

15

including June 21, 2013 would be acceptable;

16
17
18
19
20

WHEREAS, the stipulated extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline
already fixed by the Court;
THEREFORE, plaintiffs and Apple stipulate that Apple’s time to respond is extended
until June 21, 2013.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
sf-3242369

1

1

Dated: April 30, 2013

2
3

MICHAEL W. SOBOL
ROGER N. HELLER
ALLISON ELGART
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP

4
5
6

/s/ Michael W. Sobol
MICHAEL W. SOBOL

7

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

8

By:

Dated: April 30, 2013

9
10

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS
ANDREW D. MUHLBACH
STUART C. PLUNKETT
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

11
By:

12

/s/ Penelope A. Preovolos
PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS

13
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

14
15
16
17

I, Penelope A. Preovolos, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file
this Stipulation. I hereby attest that I have on file the concurrences for any signatures indicated
by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this efiled document.

18
19

By:

/s/ Penelope A. Preovolos
Penelope A. Preovolos

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: ____________________
_______________________________
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

28
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 RMW
sf-3242369

2