Wesblatt v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER 41 of Dismissal of AT&T, Inc. Without Prejudice, AT&T, Inc. Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/22/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2010)

Weisblatt v. Apple, Inc et al

Doc. 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

M. Kay Martin (CSB No. 154697) [e-mail] Joel D. Smith (CSB No. 244902) [e-mail] CROWELL & MORING LLP 275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.986.2827 Kathleen Taylor Sooy
[e-mail]

*E-FILED - 9/22/10*

CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
CROWELL & MORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

ADAM WEISBLATT, JOE HANNA, and DAVID TURK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Case No. 5:10-cv-02553-RMW STIPULATION AND [] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF AT&T INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 41(a); N.D. CAL. CIVIL L.R. 7-12] The Hon. Ronald M. Whyte FAC filed: June 23, 2010

Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC., AT&T, INC., AT&T MOBILITY LLC, and Does 1-10, Defendants.

CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF AT&T Inc.

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Northern District Local Rule 7-12, it is hereby stipulated by and among plaintiffs Adam Weisblatt, Joe Hanna and David Turk and defendants AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC (collectively, "AT&T") and defendant Apple Inc., through their respective attorneys, that the above-captioned action shall be and is dismissed without prejudice as to AT&T Inc. only. Both parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Dated: September 16, 2010 LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP By: /s/ Roger N. Heller Roger N. Heller Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: September 16, 2010 CROWELL & MORING, LLP By: /s/ M. Kay Martin

M. Kay Martin Attorneys for Defendants AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC Dated: September 16, 2010 By: MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP /s/ Penelope A. Preovolos Penelope A. Preovolos Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.

I, M. Kay Martin, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 20 Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that concurrence 21 in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
CROWELL & MORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

By:

/s/ M. Kay Martin M. Kay Martin

[] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 9/22/10 _______________________________ Hon. Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge 1 CASE NO. 5:10-cv-02553
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF AT&T Inc.