Wesblatt v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 63

STIPULATION AND ORDER 16 for Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/30/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2010)

Weisblatt v. Apple, Inc et al

Doc. 63

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607) [e-mail] ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694) [e-mail] STUART C. PLUNKETT (CA SBN 187971) [e-mail] HEATHER A. MOSER (CA SBN 212686) [e-mail] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.

*E-FILED - 11/30/10*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

COLETTE OSETEK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. APPLE INC. Defendant.

Case No.

5:10-cv-04253 RMW

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [] ORDER Assigned to: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte FAC Filed: November 5, 2010

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 5:10-cv-04253 RMW sf-2920701
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-1(a), plaintiff Colette Osetek ("Plaintiff") and defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple"), through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on November 5, 2010, Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint in the above-captioned case; WHEREAS, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), Apple's time to respond to the First Amended Complaint is November 19, 2010; WHEREAS, on November 4, 2010, Apple filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate the above-captioned case with Weisblatt, et al. v. Apple Inc., et al. (Case No. 5:10cv-02553 RMW) ("Weisblatt") and Logan v. Apple Inc., et al. (Case No. 5:10-cv-02588 RMW) ("Logan"); WHEREAS, Plaintiff in the above-captioned case, along with plaintiffs in the Weisblatt and Logan matters, intend to file a consolidated complaint; WHEREAS, this extension is intended to obviate the need to answer a complaint that will be superseded by a consolidated complaint; WHEREAS, the stipulated extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by the Court. NOW THEREFORE, plaintiff Colette Osetek and defendant Apple Inc., through their respective attorneys, HEREBY STIPULATE that: 1. Apple's time to respond to the First Amended Complaint is extended up to and

including December 20, 2010. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 5:10-cv-04253 RMW sf-2920701

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: November 19, 2010

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS ANDREW DAVID MUHLBACH STUART C. PLUNKETT HEATHER A. MOSER MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By:

/s/ Penelope A. Preovolos PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.

Dated: November 19, 2010

ROBERT C. SCHUBERT WILLEM F. JONCKHEER JASON A. PIKLER SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP

By:

/s/ Willem F. Jonckheer WILLEM F. JONCKHEER Attorneys for Plaintiff COLETTE OSETEK

I, Penelope A. Preovolos, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that I have on file the concurrences for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document. By: /s/ Penelope A. Preovolos Penelope A. Preovolos

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 5:10-cv-04253 JW sf-2920701

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 30, 2010

[] ORDER Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that Apple Inc.'s time to respond to the First Amended Complaint is extended to December 20, 2010.

The Honorable Judge Ronald M. Whyte

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 5:10-cv-04253 JW sf-2920701

3