Luciw et al v. Bank of America, N. A.

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 20 , Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/18/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2010)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROSIE LUCIW

Clear Form

CASE NO. CV10-02779-JF Plaintiff(s), v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP

----------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9
January 15, 2011 other requested deadline _____________________________________________

8/ ____ Dated:__17/10 _____

/ _ Steven Ruehmann _s/ __________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff
/ _ Jed _ ____ _s/ ___P._White _________________ Attorney for Defendant

8/ ____ Dated:__17/10 ______

------------------ ORDER [PROPOSED] Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order. January 15, 2011 9 other ___________________

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8/ _ / __ Dated:__18_10 __________

___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 11
Bryan Cave LLP 120 Broadway, Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90401-2386

PROOF OF SERVICE

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age 3 of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is Bryan Cave LLP, 120 Broadway, Suite 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401. On August 17, 2010, I served the foregoing document, described as: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

7 on each interested party in this action, as follows:
Marc A. Fisher Stephen C. Ruehmann FISHER & RUEHMANN, LLP 9580 Oak Avenue Parkway, Suite 15 Folsom, CA 95630 Tel. [phone] Fax [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff (BY MAIL) I placed a true copy (or original) of the foregoing document in a

12 13 14

15 sealed envelope addressed to each interested party as set forth above. I placed each such 16 envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, for collection and mailing at Bryan Cave

LLP, Santa Monica, California. I am readily familiar with Bryan Cave LLP's practice for 17 collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Under that practice, the correspondence would be deposited in the United States 18 Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business.

19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28

Executed on August 17, 2010, at Santa Monica, California. (FEDERAL ONLY) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America

22 that the foregoing is true and correct.

/s/ Tanisha Abrams Tanisha Abrams

2
PROOF OF SERVICE RE: ADR CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND COUNSEL