Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corporation et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (approving 28 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/2/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2010)

Download PDF
Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corporation et al Doc. 30 1 RAOUL D. KENNEDY (Bar No. 40892) DAVID W. HANSEN (Bar No. 196958) 2 JAMES P. SCHAEFER (Bar No. 250417) SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 3 Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3800 San Francisco, California 94111-4144 4 Telephone: (415) 984-6400 Facsimile: (415) 984-2698 5 Email: rkennedy@skadden.com; dhansen@skadden.co m; james.schaefer@skadden.co m 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 SANDISK CORPORATION and ELIYAHOU HARARI 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT **E-Filed 9/2/2010** NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 5:10-CV-02787 JF STIPULATION AND [PRO-----S------------ PO - ED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Judge: Honorable Jeremy Fogel 11 RITZ CAMERA & IMAGE, LLC, a Delaware limited liabilit y co mpany, on 12 behalf o f itself and others similarly situated, 13 14 v. Plaint iff, 15 SANDISK CORPORATION, ELIYAHOU HARARI 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaint iff, Ritz Camera & Image, LLC, and Defendants, SanDisk Corporation and Dr. 20 Eliyahou Harari, hereby stipulate as fo llows: 21 1. Plaint iff filed a First Amended Complaint (Docket No. 27) against Defendants on 22 August 25, 2010. 23 2. Plaint iff has agreed to extend the date by which Defendants shall be required to 24 answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint until October 1, 2010. 25 3. Defendants shall therefore have unt il October 1, 2010 to answer or otherwise 26 respond to the First Amended Co mplaint. 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 Dated: August 30, 2010 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 i By: Dated: August 30, 2010 By: BERRY & BARUCH /s/_R. Stephen Berry R. Stephen Berry Attorneys for Plaint iff, RITZ CAMERA & IMAGE, LLC SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP /s/ David W. Hansen_ David W. Hansen Attorneys for Defendants, SANDISK CORPORATION and ELIYAHOU HARARI 14 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IT IS SO ORDERED: 15 Dated: ____Se__ember 2_______, 2010 __ pt _______ 16 17 _________________________________ 18 HON. JEREMY FOGEL UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?