Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corporation et al

Filing 74

ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 68 and 73 . The Court will hold a discovery status conference on 5/17/2011 at 1:30 p.m. during which time the parties' respective proposed electronic discovery plans will be discussed. The Court does not intend to schedule further discovery status conferences. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/2/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2011)

1

** E-filed May 2, 2011 **

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

For the Northern District of California

NOT FOR CITATION

8

United States District Court

7

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

RITZ CAMERA & IMAGE, LLC, on behalf
of itself and others similarly situated,

12
Plaintiff,
13

No. C10-02787 JF (HRL)
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION

v.
14

[Re: Docket Nos. 68, 73]
SANDISK CORPORATION,

15
16
17

Defendant.
____________________________________/
On April 11, 2011, Plaintiff filed an unopposed motion requesting that this Court schedule

18

monthly discovery status conferences. Docket No. 68. Plaintiff proposed that the first such

19

conference take place on May 17, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. Id. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed another unopposed

20

motion, which asks this Court to consider the parties’ respective proposed electronic discovery plans

21

at the proposed May 17 status conference. Docket No. 73.

22

Upon review of the papers submitted, Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for the scheduling of

23

monthly discovery status conferences is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court

24

will hold a discovery status conference on May 17 at 1:30 p.m., during which time the parties’

25

respective proposed electronic discovery plans will be discussed. The Court does not intend to

26

schedule further discovery status conferences.

27
28

1
2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 2, 2011
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1

C10-02787 JF (HRL) Notice will be electronically mailed to:

2

Colleen Duffy-Smith
David W. Hansen
James Patrick Schaefer

3
4
5

Joseph S. Hall
Kfir B. Levy
Lara Anne Rogers
Raoul Dion Kennedy

6

[e-mail], [e-mail]
[e-mail], [e-mail]
[e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail], [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail]
[e-mail], [e-mail]
[e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]

7

Robert Stephen Berry
Steven F. Benz

8

See General Order 45 Section IX C.2 and D; Notice has NOT been electronically mailed to:

9

Beverly C. Moore
Kellogg Huber Hansen Todd Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C.
1615 M STreet N.W.
Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036-3209

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13
14
15

Melanie L. Bostwick
Kellogg Huber Hansen Todd Evans & Figel. P.L.L.C.
1615 M Street N.W.
Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036-3209
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3