Wilkins v. Picetti

Filing 68

Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding. Case settled. Signed by Judge Nandor J Vadas on 10/21/14. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KEENAN G. WILKINS, Case No. C 10-2818 LHK (NJV) Plaintiff, 8 v. REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING 9 10 GREGORY J. AHERN, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 A settlement conference was held on October 9, 2014 in San Francisco, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below: (1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the 16 proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority: 17 ( X ) Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel Yolanda Huang and Dennis Cunningham 18 ( ) Warden or warden’s representative 19 ( ) Office of the California Attorney General 20 ( X ) Other: Defense Counsel Michael Wenzel and Talia Saypoff 21 (2) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear: 22 _____________________________________________________________________ 23 (3) The outcome of the proceeding was: 24 25 26 (X) The case has been completely settled. A telephonic status conference is scheduled for November 18, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. ( ) The case has been partially resolved and counsel for defendants shall file a joint 27 stipulation regarding those claims which have been resolved. The issues outlined on the sheet 28 attached remain for this Court to resolve. 1 2 3 4 5 ( ) The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 21, 2014 ______________________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?