Scott v. Federal Bond and Collection Service, Inc. et al
Filing
49
JUDGMENT Pursuant to Rule 68 and REQUEST for Clarification Re: Attorney's Fees and Costs. Signed by Judge Koh on 4/14/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2011)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
YVONNE AGNES SCOTT,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
FEDERAL BOND AND COLLECTION
)
SERVICE, INC., D/B/A FBCS, INC., a
)
Pennsylvania corporation; JOSEPH NEARY,
)
individually and in his official capacity; and
)
OSIRIS HOLDINGS, LLC, a Maryland limited )
liability corporation,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.: 10-CV-02825-LHK
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 68 AND
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION RE:
ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS
Pursuant to the Notice of Acceptance of Offer of Judgment and the Defendants’ Rule 68
17
Offer of Judgment filed in this case, the Court hereby enters judgment for Plaintiff Yvonne Agnes
18
Scott in the amount of two thousand and one dollars ($2,001.00), plus the reasonable attorney’s
19
fees and costs incurred by Plaintiff in this action.
20
The Court requests clarification regarding whether the parties have reached an agreement
21
regarding attorney’s fees and costs. Accordingly, by noon on Friday, April 15, 2011, the parties
22
shall file a notice stating whether fees and costs have been agreed upon by the parties or will need
23
to be determined by the Court. If the parties have not reached an agreement, Plaintiff’s counsel’s
24
motion for attorney’s fees shall be filed within three weeks of this Order.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: April 14, 2011
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
27
28
1
Case No.: 10-CV-02825-LHK
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 68 AND REQUEST FOR
CLARIFICATION RE: ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?