Abaxis, Inc. v. Cepheid
Filing
146
ORDER re 113 Discovery Dispute Joint Report #2. DDJR #2 denied as moot per 144 Letter filed by Cepheid. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/19/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2012)
1
2
*E-FILED: March 19, 2012*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
12
13
14
15
No. C10-02840 LHK (HRL)
ABAXIS, INC.,
ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE
JOINT REPORT #2
Plaintiff,
v.
[Re: Docket No. 113]
CEPHEID,
Defendant.
/
16
17
18
Defendant having requested that the matter be withdrawn from consideration, the
parties’ Discovery Dispute Joint Report #2 is denied as moot.
19
SO ORDERED.
20
Dated: March 19, 2012
21
HOWARD R. LLOYD
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
5:10-cv-02840-LHK Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Bryan John Boyle
3
Carolyn Chang
4
David James Miclean DMiclean@MicleanLaw.com, dmiclean@micleangleason.com,
gvieyra@micleangleason.com
bryan.boyle@cooley.com, mweiand@cooley.com
cchang@fenwick.com, vschmitt@fenwick.com
5
Jonathan Elliot Singer
singer@fr.com, skarboe@fr.com
6
Lam Khanh Nguyen
lnguyen@cooley.com, tberryhill@cooley.com
7
Limin Zheng
zheng@fr.com, horsley@fr.com
8
Lynn Harold Pasahow
lpasahow@fenwick.com, tchow@fenwick.com
9
Rebecca Charnas Grant
rgrant@fr.com, varelas@fr.com
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Ricardo Rodriguez rodriguezr@cooley.com, douglasjar@cooley.com, elliottds@cooley.com,
tanisawakm@cooley.com
12
Ryan Aftel Tyz
13
Steven C. Carlson
14
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
rtyz@fenwick.com, icampos@fenwick.com
scarlson@fr.com, lopacinski@fr.com, philip.wu@fr.com
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?