Abaxis, Inc. v. Cepheid

Filing 146

ORDER re 113 Discovery Dispute Joint Report #2. DDJR #2 denied as moot per 144 Letter filed by Cepheid. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/19/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED: March 19, 2012* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 12 13 14 15 No. C10-02840 LHK (HRL) ABAXIS, INC., ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE JOINT REPORT #2 Plaintiff, v. [Re: Docket No. 113] CEPHEID, Defendant. / 16 17 18 Defendant having requested that the matter be withdrawn from consideration, the parties’ Discovery Dispute Joint Report #2 is denied as moot. 19 SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: March 19, 2012 21 HOWARD R. LLOYD 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 5:10-cv-02840-LHK Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Bryan John Boyle 3 Carolyn Chang 4 David James Miclean DMiclean@MicleanLaw.com, dmiclean@micleangleason.com, gvieyra@micleangleason.com bryan.boyle@cooley.com, mweiand@cooley.com cchang@fenwick.com, vschmitt@fenwick.com 5 Jonathan Elliot Singer singer@fr.com, skarboe@fr.com 6 Lam Khanh Nguyen lnguyen@cooley.com, tberryhill@cooley.com 7 Limin Zheng zheng@fr.com, horsley@fr.com 8 Lynn Harold Pasahow lpasahow@fenwick.com, tchow@fenwick.com 9 Rebecca Charnas Grant rgrant@fr.com, varelas@fr.com 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Ricardo Rodriguez rodriguezr@cooley.com, douglasjar@cooley.com, elliottds@cooley.com, tanisawakm@cooley.com 12 Ryan Aftel Tyz 13 Steven C. Carlson 14 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. rtyz@fenwick.com, icampos@fenwick.com scarlson@fr.com, lopacinski@fr.com, philip.wu@fr.com 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?