Abaxis, Inc. v. Cepheid
Filing
167
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 166 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2012)
Case5:10-cv-02840-LHK Document166 Filed04/27/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Juanita R. Brooks
(CA # 75934 / brooks@fr.com)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
12390 El Camino Real
San Diego, CA 92130
Telephone: (858) 678-5070
Facsimile: (858) 678-5099
Steven C. Carlson (CA # 206451 /
steven.carlson@fr.com)
Limin Zheng (CA # 226875 / zheng@fr.com)
Rebecca Charnas Grant (CA #264214 /
rgrant@fr.com)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: (650) 839-5070
Facsimile: (650) 839-5071
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
(SAN JOSE DIVISION)
ABAXIS, INC.,
16
17
18
19
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
ABAXIS, INC.
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
CEPHEID
12
15
Ricardo Rodriguez
(CA # 173003 / rr@cooley.com)
Bryan J. Boyle (CA # 253725 /
bryan.boyle@cooley.com)
Lam K. Nguyen
(CA #265285 / lnguyen@cooley.com)
COOLEY LLP
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone: (650) 843-5000
Facsimile: (650) 857-0663
Civil Case No. 10-2840 LHK (HRL)
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE FOR
EXPERT DEPOSITION
v.
CEPHEID,
Defendant and Counter-Claimant.
20
21
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant Abaxis Inc.
22
(“Abaxis”) and Defendant-Counterclaimant Cepheid (“Cepheid”) respectfully submit the
23
following Stipulation and Proposed Order.
24
In order to accommodate the schedule of Cepheid’s damages expert, the parties in the
25
above-captioned matter hereby stipulate to extend the deadline to depose this expert from May 4,
26
2012 to May 29, 2012. All other dates in this case shall be unaffected.
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE
FOR EXPERT DEPOSITION
Civil Case No. 10-2840 LHK (HRL)
Case5:10-cv-02840-LHK Document166 Filed04/27/12 Page2 of 3
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the previous time modifications in this case include the
2
Stipulation and Order Extending (1) Cepheid’s Time to File Its Answer and Amended
3
Counterclaims to Amended Complaint, and (2) Abaxis’ Time to File Its Response to
4
Counterclaims (Dkt No. 28), the Stipulation and Order Modifying Case Schedule (Dkt. No. 31);
5
the Stipulation and Order Continuing Hearing and Case Management Conference (Dkt. No. 38);
6
the Minute Order and Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 44); the Stipulation and Order Extending
7
Deadlines for Mediation and Joint Case Management Statement (Dkt. No. 65); the Order
8
Regarding Case Schedule and Briefing of Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 67); the Minute Order and
9
Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 84); the Stipulation and Order Extending Time for Abaxis to
10
Respond to Cepheid’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 90); the Minute and Order
11
and Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 110); the Minute Order and Case Management Order (Dkt.
12
No. 133); the Order re Expediting Briefing Schedule (Dkt. No. 145); and the Order Modifying
13
Schedule for Expert Reports (Dkt. No. 162).
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
Dated: April 27, 2012
Dated: April 27, 2012
17
COOLEY LLP
FISH & RICHARDSON PC
18
/s/ Ricardo Rodriguez
Ricardo Rodriguez (Bar No. 173003)
Bryan Boyle (Bar No. 253725)
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
ABAXIS INC.
/s/ Steven C. Carlson
Steven C. Carlson (Bar No. 206451)
Limin Zheng (Bar No. 226875)
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
CEPHEID
16
19
20
21
22
[PROPOSED] ORDER
23
24
25
26
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore;
IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 30
Dated: ____________, 2012
______________________
Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING SCHEDULE FOR EXPER DEPOSITION
Civil Case No. 10-2840 LHK (HRL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?