Abaxis, Inc. v. Cepheid

Filing 167

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 166 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2012)

Download PDF
Case5:10-cv-02840-LHK Document166 Filed04/27/12 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Juanita R. Brooks (CA # 75934 / brooks@fr.com) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 678-5070 Facsimile: (858) 678-5099 Steven C. Carlson (CA # 206451 / steven.carlson@fr.com) Limin Zheng (CA # 226875 / zheng@fr.com) Rebecca Charnas Grant (CA #264214 / rgrant@fr.com) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (650) 839-5070 Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 (SAN JOSE DIVISION) ABAXIS, INC., 16 17 18 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant ABAXIS, INC. Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant CEPHEID 12 15 Ricardo Rodriguez (CA # 173003 / rr@cooley.com) Bryan J. Boyle (CA # 253725 / bryan.boyle@cooley.com) Lam K. Nguyen (CA #265285 / lnguyen@cooley.com) COOLEY LLP Five Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 Telephone: (650) 843-5000 Facsimile: (650) 857-0663 Civil Case No. 10-2840 LHK (HRL) Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE FOR EXPERT DEPOSITION v. CEPHEID, Defendant and Counter-Claimant. 20 21 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant Abaxis Inc. 22 (“Abaxis”) and Defendant-Counterclaimant Cepheid (“Cepheid”) respectfully submit the 23 following Stipulation and Proposed Order. 24 In order to accommodate the schedule of Cepheid’s damages expert, the parties in the 25 above-captioned matter hereby stipulate to extend the deadline to depose this expert from May 4, 26 2012 to May 29, 2012. All other dates in this case shall be unaffected. 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE FOR EXPERT DEPOSITION Civil Case No. 10-2840 LHK (HRL) Case5:10-cv-02840-LHK Document166 Filed04/27/12 Page2 of 3 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the previous time modifications in this case include the 2 Stipulation and Order Extending (1) Cepheid’s Time to File Its Answer and Amended 3 Counterclaims to Amended Complaint, and (2) Abaxis’ Time to File Its Response to 4 Counterclaims (Dkt No. 28), the Stipulation and Order Modifying Case Schedule (Dkt. No. 31); 5 the Stipulation and Order Continuing Hearing and Case Management Conference (Dkt. No. 38); 6 the Minute Order and Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 44); the Stipulation and Order Extending 7 Deadlines for Mediation and Joint Case Management Statement (Dkt. No. 65); the Order 8 Regarding Case Schedule and Briefing of Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 67); the Minute Order and 9 Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 84); the Stipulation and Order Extending Time for Abaxis to 10 Respond to Cepheid’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 90); the Minute and Order 11 and Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 110); the Minute Order and Case Management Order (Dkt. 12 No. 133); the Order re Expediting Briefing Schedule (Dkt. No. 145); and the Order Modifying 13 Schedule for Expert Reports (Dkt. No. 162). 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 Dated: April 27, 2012 Dated: April 27, 2012 17 COOLEY LLP FISH & RICHARDSON PC 18 /s/ Ricardo Rodriguez Ricardo Rodriguez (Bar No. 173003) Bryan Boyle (Bar No. 253725) Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant ABAXIS INC. /s/ Steven C. Carlson Steven C. Carlson (Bar No. 206451) Limin Zheng (Bar No. 226875) Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant CEPHEID 16 19 20 21 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER 23 24 25 26 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore; IT IS SO ORDERED. April 30 Dated: ____________, 2012 ______________________ Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULE FOR EXPER DEPOSITION Civil Case No. 10-2840 LHK (HRL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?