Kaufman & Broad Monterey Bay et al v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Filing
237
PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIAL). Based on the parties' Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement, the court has determined an appearance is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the 8/31/2012 Preliminary Pretrial Conference is VACATED and the parties are ordered to comply with the following schedule: Joint Final Pretrial Conference statement, Motions in Limine and Exchange of Exhibits due 1/4/2013. Voir Dire Questions, Proposed Jury Instructions, and Proposed Jury Verdict Forms, and Oppo sitions to Motions in Limine due 1/8/2013. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/18/2013 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Jury Selection set for 2/25/2013 09:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 2/26/2013, 2/27/2013, 2/28/2013, 3/5/2013, 3/6/2013, 3/7/2013. Jury Deliberations set for 3/8/2013 before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/27/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
CASE NO. 5:CV 10-02856-EJD
KAUFMAN & BROAD MONTEREY
BAY, a California corporation; KB HOME
SOUTH BA, INC., a California corporation,
PRETRIAL ORDER
(JURY TRIAL)
Plaintiffs,
v.
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY
COMPANY OF AMERICA; and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
/
18
The above-entitled action is scheduled for a Preliminary Pretrial Conference on August 31,
19
2012. Based on the parties’ Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement (see Docket Item No.
20
236), the court has determined an appearance is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the
21
Preliminary Pretrial Conference is VACATED and the parties are ordered to comply with the
22
following schedule.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following schedule shall apply to this case:
EVENT
DATE
Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement, Motions in Limine
and Exchange of Exhibits
January 4, 2013
Voir Dire Questions, Proposed Jury Instructions, and
Proposed Jury Verdict Forms, and Oppositions to Motions in
Limine
January 8, 2013
CASE NO. 5:CV 10-02856-EJD
PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIAL)
1
1
Final Pretrial Conference
11:00 a.m. on January 18, 2013
2
Deposition and Discovery Designations
February 12, 2013
3
Trial Briefs (optional), submission of Trial Exhibits
February 19, 2013
4
Jury Selection
9:00 a.m. on February 25, 2013
5
Jury Trial1
2/26-2/27/13 (full days), 2/28/13
(1/2 day), 3/5-3/6/13 (full days),
3/7/13 (1/2 day)
Jury Deliberations
March 8, 2013
6
7
8
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with the Standing Order re:
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Preliminary and Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation, a copy of which is available from
12
the Clerk of the Court,2 with regard to all pretrial submissions.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
Dated: August 27, 2012
15
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jury trials are held in full day sessions on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, and morning
sessions on Thursdays (9:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m.), unless the Court otherwise specifies. At the Final
Pretrial Conference, the Court reserves the right to add morning sessions on Mondays (9:00
a.m.–12:00 p.m.), thus creating extra half-days for trial. The final trial schedule will be confirmed at
the Final Pretrial Conference.
1
A copy of Judge Davila’s standing order is also available on the court’s website at
www.cand.uscourts.gov by clicking first on the “Judges” button, then on Judge Davila’s name, then
on the link for “Judge Davila’s Standing Orders,” and finally on the link for “Standing Order Re
Pretrial Preparation.”
2
2
CASE NO. 5:CV 10-02856-EJD
PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIAL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?