Goodlick v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 51

STIPULATION AND ORDER 47 Extending Time to Respond to Complaints. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/16/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2010)

Download PDF
Goodlick v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 51 1 2 3 4 5 IRA P. ROTHKEN, SBN 160029 ROTHKEN LAW FIRM 3 Hamilton Landing, Ste 280 Novato, CA 94949 Telephone: (415) 924-4250 Facsimile: (415) 924-2905 Email: ira@techfirm.com *E-FILED - 9/16/10* 6 Attorneys for Interested Party and 7 Plaintiff in Related Case, 8 9 10 11 12 13 STEVE TIETZE WILLIAM A. KERSHAW KERSHAW CUTTER & RATINOFF LLP 401 Watt Avenue Sacramento, CA 95864 Tel: 916-448-9800 Fax: 916-669-4499 Email: wkershaw@kcrlegal.com MICHAEL JAMES GOODLICK, et al. Signature Pages] PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: 415-268-7187 Fax: 415-268-7522 Email: ppreovolos@mofo.com Attorneys for Defendant APPLE, INC. 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 15 16 [Additional Joining Plaintiffs' Counsel on 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Jose Division MICHAEL JAMES GOODLICK, et al. Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC. and AT&T CORP. Defendants. ALAN BENVENISTY, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant. Case63 No: 5:10-cv-02862-RMW (pvt) JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINTS [] ORDER Case No: 5:10-cv-02885- RMW (pvt) -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 CHRISTOPHER DYDYK, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC. and AT&T, INC., Defendants. JEFFREY ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant. DAVID POPIK Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., et al. Defendant. STEVE TIETZE, Plaintiff, vs. APPLE, INC., Defendant. CHARLES PASANO, Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC. and AT&T Defendants. A. TODD MAYO Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC. Defendants. GREG AGUILERA, II Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC. and AT&T CORP. Defendants. Case No: 5:10-cv-02897- RMW (pvt) Case No: 5:10-cv-02916- RMW (pvt) Case No: 5:10-cv-02928- RMW (pvt) Case No: 5:10-cv-02929- RMW (pvt) Case No: 5:10-cv-03010- RMW (pvt) Case No: 5:10-cv-03017- RMW (pvt) Case No: 3:10-cv-03056- RMW (pvt) WHEREAS, the nine above-captioned proposed nationwide class actions 27 brought on behalf of all "iPhone 4" users alleging, among other things, design 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -2- 1 defects and loss of service, have been related in the Northern District of California 2 under Civil L.R. 3-12 before the Hon. Ronald M. Whyte; 3 WHEREAS, an extension is necessary to give time for the Judicial Panel for 1 4 Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") to decide motions to transfer in MDL No. 2188, 5 set for hearing on September 30, 2010; 6 WHEREAS, Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") has been granted previous 7 extensions up through and including Monday, August 30, 2010, in which to file 8 Defendants' responsive pleadings to the complaints (or amended complaints, as 9 applicable) in the above-captioned cases; 10 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Apple have agreed that the deadline for any and 11 all responsive pleadings currently due should be extended forty-five (45) days to 12 Thursday, October 14, 2010; 13 NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Apple, through their counsel of record, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that, Defendants' responsive pleadings to 14 stipulate to the following: 15 16 the complaints (or amended complaints, as applicable) in the above-captioned 17 cases shall be extended up through and including Thursday, October 14, 2010. 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Multiple MDL motions have been filed and are pending, some of which request that all nationwide cases be transferred to the Northern District of California. 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: August 26, 2010 KERSHAW CUTTER & RATINOFF LLP By:______/S/__________________ William A. Kershaw Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHAEL JAMES GOODLICK, TREVOR ANTUNEZ, JACLYN BADOLATO, BRYAN COLVER, VINNY CURBELO, JOSHUA GILSON, JESSICA LARES, BRANDON ELLISON REININGER, JAYWILL SANDS, NICOLE STANKOVITZ and KAREN YOUNG KERSHAW CUTTER & RATINOFF LLP 401 Watt Avenue Sacramento, CA 95864 Tel: 916-448-9800 Fax: 916-669-4499 Email: wkershaw@kcrlegal.com DATED: August 26, 2010 GARDY & NOTIS, LLP By:_______ /S/_________________ Jennifer Sarnelli Attorneys for Plaintiff ALAN BENVENISTY, ANTHONY COLOGNA and JOY BEARDEN GARDY & NOTIS, LLP 560 Sylvan Avenue Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632 201.567.7377 phone 201.567.7337 fax jsarnelli@gardylaw.com STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DATED: August 26, 2010 RAM & OLSON By: ______/S/__________________ Michael Ram Attorneys for Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER DYDYK RAM & OLSON 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, California 94111 Tel: (415) 433-4949 Fax: (415) 433-7311 Email: mram@ramolson.com Gary E. Mason MASON LLP 1625 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Suite 605 Washington, DC 20036 Tel: 202-429-2290 Fax: 202-429-2294 Email: gmason@masonlawdc.com SHUBLAW LLC By: ______/S/________________ Jonathan Shub Attorney for Plaintiff JEFFREY RODGERS SHUBLAW LLC 1818 Market Street, 13th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19106 Tel: 610-453-6551 Fax: 215-569-1606 Email: jshub@shublaw.com 16 DATED: August 26, 2010 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DATED: August 26, 2010 KIRTLAND & PACKARD LLP By:_______ /S/_________________ Michael Louis Kelly Behram Viraf Parekh Heather Marie Peterson Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID POPIK KIRTLAND & PACKARD LLP 2361 Rosecrans Avenue, Fourth Floor El Segundo, CA 90245-4923 Tel: 310-536-1000 Fax: 310-536-1001 Email: mlk@kirtlandpackard.com Email: bparekh@yaplaw.com Email: hmp@kirtlandpackard.com ROTHKEN LAW FIRM By: ________/S/_______________ IRA P. ROTHKEN Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE TIETZE ROTHKEN LAW FIRM 3 Hamilton Landing, Ste 280 Novato, CA 94949 Telephone: (415) 924-4250 Facsimile: (415) 924-2905 ira@techfirm.com 13 DATED: August 26, 2010 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -6- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATED: August 26, 2010 FARUQI & FARUQI LLP By:______ /S/________________ Vahn Alexander Attorneys for Plaintiff CHARLES PASANO FARUQI & FARUQI LLP 1901 Avenue of the Stars Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Tel: (310) 461-1426 Fax: (310) 461-1427 Email: valexander@faruqilaw.com SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP By:_______ /S/_________________ Rosemary Farrales Luzon Attorneys for Plaintiff A. TODD MAYO SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP 401 West A Street, Suite 2350 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: (619) 235-2416 Fax: (619) 234-7334 Email: rluzon@sfmslaw.com 11 DATED: August 26, 2010 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -7- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DATED: August 26, 2010 WEXLER WALLACE LLP By:_______ /S/_________________ Mark John Tamblyn Ian James Barlow Neha Duggal Attorneys for Plaintiff GREG AGUILERA, II WEXLER WALLACE LLP 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 231 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel: (916) 492-1100 Fax: (916) 492-1124 Email: mjt@wexlerwallace.com Email: ijb@wexlerwallace.com Email: nd@wexlerwallace.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By:_______ /S/_________________ Penelope A. Preovolos Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: 415-268-7187 Fax: 415-268-7522 Email: ppreovolos@mofo.com 13 DATED: August 27, 2010 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures 23 indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this efiled document. 24 DATED: August 26, 2010 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ROTHKEN LAW FIRM By: _______/S/________________ IRA P. ROTHKEN -8- 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. _____________________________ DISTRICT JUDGE 9/16/10 2 DATED: _________________ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT -9-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?