Goodlick v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 70

STIPULATION AND ORDER 2 Extending Time to Respond to Complaints. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/30/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2010)

Goodlick v. Apple, Inc.

Doc. 70

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607) [e-mail] ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694) [e-mail] STUART C. PLUNKETT (CA SBN 187971) [e-mail] HEATHER A. MOSER (CA SBN 212686) [e-mail] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. [Additional Joining Counsel on Signature Pages]

*E-FILED - 11/30/10*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE APPLE IPHONE 4 PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Goodlick - Case No. 5:10-2862 Benvenisty - Case No. 5:10-2885 Dydyk - Case No. 5:10-2897 Rodgers - Case No. 5:10-2916 Popik - Case No. 5:10-2928 Tietze - Case No. 5:10-2929 Fasano - Case No. 5:10-3010 Mayo - Case No. 5:10-3017 Aguilera- Case No. 5:10-3056 Noble - Case No. 5:10-3957 Milrot - Case No. 5:10-4117 Derose - Case No. 5:10-4273

Case No. 5:10-md-02188-RMW JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINTS; [] ORDER The Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT sf-2919649

1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, the twelve above-captioned proposed class actions brought on behalf of iPhone 4 users have been related in the Northern District of California under Civil L.R. 3-12 before the Hon. Ronald M. Whyte; WHEREAS, on October 8, 2010, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") issued an Order transferring four additional actions to the Northern District of California and assigning the matters to the Honorable Ronald M. Whyte for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings;1 WHEREAS, Defendant Apple Inc. has been granted previous extensions to file responsive pleadings to the complaints, up through and including November 15, 2010, in the above captioned matters; WHEREAS, Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC ("ATTM") has been granted previous extensions to file responsive pleadings to the complaints, up through and including November 15, 2010, in Goodglick and Popik, the cases in which it has been named as a defendant and served with the complaint; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that the deadline for any and all responsive pleadings currently due should be extended by 30 days to December 15, 2010; WHEREAS, the stipulated extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by the court; NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their counsel of record, stipulate to the following: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Apple's responsive pleadings to the complaints (or amended complaints, as applicable) in the above-captioned cases and ATTM's responsive pleadings to the complaints (or amended complaints, as applicable) in Goodglick and Popik shall be extended up through and including December 15, 2010.
1

The Transfer Order includes the following four actions: Gionis v. Apple Inc, et al. Case No. 1:10-11110 (D. Mass.); McCaffrey v. Apple Inc., et al. Case No. 1:10-1776 (D. Md.); Purdue v. Apple Inc. et al, Case No. 3:10-687 (M.D. Tenn); and Nguyen v. Apple Inc., Case No. 3:10-252 (S.D. Tex.).

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT sf-2919649

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT sf-2919649

IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: November 9, 2010 PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS ANDREW D. MUHLBACH STUART C. PLUNKETT HEATHER A. MOSER MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Stuart C. Plunkett Stuart C. Plunkett Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.

Dated: November 9, 2010

KATHLEEN TAYLOR SOOY M. KAY MARTIN JOEL D. SMITH By: /s/ Kathleen Taylor Sooy Kathleen Taylor Sooy Attorneys for Defendant AT&T MOBILITY LLC

CROWELL & MORING LLP 275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail]

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: November 9, 2010

KERSHAW CUTTER & RATINOFF LLP By: /s/ William A. Kershaw William A. Kershaw Attorney for Plaintiffs MICHAEL JAMES GOODGLICK, ET AL.

KERSHAW CUTTER & RATINOFF LLP 401 Watt Avenue Sacramento, CA 95684 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Dated: November 9, 2010 GARDY & NOTIS LLP By: /s/ Jennifer Sarnelli Jennifer Sarnelli Attorney for Plaintiffs ALAN BENVENISTY, ET AL.

GARDY & NORIS LLP 560 Sylvan Avenue Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT sf-2919649

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: November 9, 2010

RAM & OLSON LLP By: /s/ Michael Ram Michael Ram Attorney for Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER DYDYK

RAM & OLSON 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Dated: November 9, 2010 SHUBLAW LLC By: /s/ Jonathan Shub Jonathan Shub Attorney for Plaintiff JEFFREY RODGERS

SHUBLAW LLC 1818 Market Street, 13th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19106 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Dated: November 9, 2010 KIRTLAND & PACKARD LLP By: /s/ Michael Louis Kelly Michael Louis Kelly Attorney for Plaintiff DAVID POPIK KIRTLAND & PACKARD LLP 2361 Rosecrans Avenue, Fourth Floor Segundo, CA 90245 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

El

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT sf-2919649

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: November 9, 2010

ROTHKEN LAW FIRM By: /s/ Ira P.Rothken Ira P. Rothken Attorney for Plaintiff STEVE TIETZE ROTHKEN LAW FIRM 3 Hamilton Landing Ste 280 Novato, CA 94949 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

Dated: November 9, 2010

FARUQI & FARUQI LLP By: /s/ Vahn Alexander Vahn Alexander Attorney for Plaintiff CHARLES FASANO

FARUQI & FARUQI LLP 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT sf-2919649

6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: November 9, 2010

SHEPARD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH LLP By: /s/ Rosemary Farrales Luzon Rosemary Farrales Luzon Attorney for Plaintiff A. TODD MAYO

SHEPARD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH LLP 401 West A Street, Suite 2350 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Dated: November 9, 2010 WEXLER WALLACE LLP By: /s/ Mark J. Tamblyn Mark J. Tamblyn Attorney for Plaintiff GREG AGUILERA, II

WEXLER WALLACE LLP 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 231 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT sf-2919649

7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: November 9, 2010

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD
LLP

By:

/s/ Stuart A. Davidson Stuart A. Davidson Attorney for Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER DEROSE AND STACY MILROT

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 120 E. Palmetto Road, Suite 500 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

Dated: November 9, 2010

AMAMGBO & ASSOCIATES By: /s/ Donald Amamgbo Donald Amamgbo Attorney for Plaintiff ZETHA NOBLE

AMAMGBO & ASSOCIATES 7901 Oakport, Suite 4900 Oakland, CA 94621 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email:[e-mail]

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. Dated: November 9, 2010 STUART C. PLUNKETT MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: s/ Stuart C. Plunkett STUART C. PLUNKETT

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT sf-2919649

8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: Defendants' responsive pleadings to the complaints (or amended complaints, as applicable) in the above-captioned cases shall be extended up through and including December 15, 2010.

Dated: November 30, 2010

By: The Honorable Judge Ronald M. Whyte

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT sf-2919649

9