Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) PTE. Ltd. v. IPtronics Inc. et al
Filing
330
Order Granting 318 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Richard Allan Horning; Imran A. Khaliq; Matthew Peter Larson; Arthur S. Beeman and Dana Johannes Finberg terminated. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 12/11/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2012)
10
Attorney for Defendants/Counterclaimants
IPtronics, Inc. and IPtronics A/S
ER
R NIA
J . D av i l
H
9
RT
8
d w a rd
J u d ge E
ERED
a
FO
7
O ORD
IT IS S
LI
6
Jerrold Abeles (State Bar No. 138464)
EMAIL: ABELES.JERRY@ARENTFOX.COM
ARENT FOX LLP
555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Telephone: (213) 629-7400
Facsimile: (213) 629-7401
RT
U
O
5
NO
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
3
S
2
Anthony W. Shaw (admitted pro hac vice)
EMAIL: SHAW.ANTHONY@ARENTFOX.COM
ARENT FOX LLP
1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20036-5339
Telephone: (202) 857-6000
Facsimile: (202) 857-6395
UNIT
ED
1
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
12/11/2012
11
12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN JOSE DIVISION
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S. INC.,
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP
(SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., AVAGO
TECHNOLOGIES TRADING LTD.,
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL SALES, PTE. LTD.
AND AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES FIBER
IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
Case No. 5:10-cv-02863-EJD (PSG)
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION AND
WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL
Plaintiffs,
vs.
IPTRONICS INC. and IPTRONICS A/S,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the law firm of Arent Fox LLP hereby makes its appearance
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL
Case No. 5:10-cv-02863-EJD (PSG)
1
as counsel of record for Defendants IPtronics, Inc. and IPtronics A/S (“IPtronics”) in the above-
2
captioned action, in substitution for the law firm of SNR Denton US LLP.
3
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that counsel Richard Allan Horning, Dana J.
4
Finberg, Arthur S. Beeman, Imran A. Khaliq, and Matthew P. Larson of SNR Denton US LLP
5
hereby withdraw as counsel of record for Defendants/Counterclaimants in the above-captioned
6
action.
7
8
9
10
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: December 3, 2012
11
12
By: /s/ Anthony W. Shaw
Anthony W. Shaw
Arent Fox LLP
Attorney for Defendants/Counterclaimants
IPTRONICS, INC. and IPTRONICS A/S
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Dated: December 3, 2012
By: /s/ Richard Allan Horning
Richard Allan Horning
Dana J. Finberg
Arthur S. Beeman
Imran A. Khaliq
Matthew P. Larson
SNR Denton US LLP
Attorney for Defendants/Counterclaimants
IPTRONICS, INC. and IPTRONICS A/S
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL
Case No. 5:10-cv-02863-EJD (PSG)
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on December 3, 2012, I caused the following document(s):
3
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL
4
to be served on the following parties by electronic transmission to the e-mail addresses listed
5
below:
6
7
8
9
Shawn E. McDonald (State Bar No. 237580)
Gina A. Bibby (State Bar No. 242657)
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
SEMCDONALD@FOLEY.COM
EMAIL: GBIBBY@FOLEY.COM
975 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1013
10
Ary Chang (State Bar No. 244247)
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
EMAIL: ACHANG@FOLEY.COM
3579 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92130
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Rick S. Florsheim (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Cynthia J. Franecki (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
EMAIL: RFLORSHEIM@FOLEY.COM
EMAIL: CFRANECKI@FOLEY.COM
777 E Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53202-5306
John C. Vetter (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
EMAIL: JVETTER@FOLEY.COM
One South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1900
Miami, FL 33151
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed on December
3, 2012, in Washington, D.C.
/s/ Matthew P. Larson
Matthew P. Larson
26
27
28
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL
Case No. 5:10-cv-02863-EJD (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?