Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) PTE. Ltd. v. IPtronics Inc. et al

Filing 330

Order Granting 318 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Richard Allan Horning; Imran A. Khaliq; Matthew Peter Larson; Arthur S. Beeman and Dana Johannes Finberg terminated. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 12/11/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2012)

Download PDF
10 Attorney for Defendants/Counterclaimants IPtronics, Inc. and IPtronics A/S ER R NIA J . D av i l H 9 RT 8 d w a rd J u d ge E ERED a FO 7 O ORD IT IS S LI 6 Jerrold Abeles (State Bar No. 138464) EMAIL: ABELES.JERRY@ARENTFOX.COM ARENT FOX LLP 555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90013 Telephone: (213) 629-7400 Facsimile: (213) 629-7401 RT U O 5 NO 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 3 S 2 Anthony W. Shaw (admitted pro hac vice) EMAIL: SHAW.ANTHONY@ARENTFOX.COM ARENT FOX LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036-5339 Telephone: (202) 857-6000 Facsimile: (202) 857-6395 UNIT ED 1 N D IS T IC T R OF C 12/11/2012 11 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN JOSE DIVISION 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S. INC., AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES TRADING LTD., AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES, PTE. LTD. AND AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES FIBER IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. Case No. 5:10-cv-02863-EJD (PSG) NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL Plaintiffs, vs. IPTRONICS INC. and IPTRONICS A/S, Defendants. 25 26 27 28 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the law firm of Arent Fox LLP hereby makes its appearance NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL Case No. 5:10-cv-02863-EJD (PSG) 1 as counsel of record for Defendants IPtronics, Inc. and IPtronics A/S (“IPtronics”) in the above- 2 captioned action, in substitution for the law firm of SNR Denton US LLP. 3 PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that counsel Richard Allan Horning, Dana J. 4 Finberg, Arthur S. Beeman, Imran A. Khaliq, and Matthew P. Larson of SNR Denton US LLP 5 hereby withdraw as counsel of record for Defendants/Counterclaimants in the above-captioned 6 action. 7 8 9 10 Respectfully submitted, Dated: December 3, 2012 11 12 By: /s/ Anthony W. Shaw Anthony W. Shaw Arent Fox LLP Attorney for Defendants/Counterclaimants IPTRONICS, INC. and IPTRONICS A/S 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: December 3, 2012 By: /s/ Richard Allan Horning Richard Allan Horning Dana J. Finberg Arthur S. Beeman Imran A. Khaliq Matthew P. Larson SNR Denton US LLP Attorney for Defendants/Counterclaimants IPTRONICS, INC. and IPTRONICS A/S 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL Case No. 5:10-cv-02863-EJD (PSG) 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on December 3, 2012, I caused the following document(s): 3 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL 4 to be served on the following parties by electronic transmission to the e-mail addresses listed 5 below: 6 7 8 9 Shawn E. McDonald (State Bar No. 237580) Gina A. Bibby (State Bar No. 242657) FOLEY & LARDNER LLP SEMCDONALD@FOLEY.COM EMAIL: GBIBBY@FOLEY.COM 975 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1013 10 Ary Chang (State Bar No. 244247) FOLEY & LARDNER LLP EMAIL: ACHANG@FOLEY.COM 3579 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Rick S. Florsheim (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Cynthia J. Franecki (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) FOLEY & LARDNER LLP EMAIL: RFLORSHEIM@FOLEY.COM EMAIL: CFRANECKI@FOLEY.COM 777 E Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53202-5306 John C. Vetter (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) FOLEY & LARDNER LLP EMAIL: JVETTER@FOLEY.COM One South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1900 Miami, FL 33151 Attorneys for Plaintiff Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed on December 3, 2012, in Washington, D.C. /s/ Matthew P. Larson Matthew P. Larson 26 27 28 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL Case No. 5:10-cv-02863-EJD (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?