Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) PTE. Ltd. v. IPtronics Inc. et al

Filing 38

ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Upon review of the parties' statement, the Court finds a conference unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the March 7 Case Management Conference. The Court will set a date for a furth er Case Management Conference in its Order following the Claim Construction Proceedings. In addition, upon review of the patents-in-suit, the Court GRANTS the parties' request for an additional fifteen minutes each to present their tutorials and an additional thirty minutes each for their claim construction presentation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/2/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2011)

Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) PTE. Ltd. v. IPtronics Inc. et al

Doc. 38

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Avago Tech. Fiber IP (Singapore) PTE. Ltd., Plaintiff, v.
For the Northern District of California

NO. C 10-02863 JW ORDER VACATING INTERIM CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

United States District Court

11 12

Iptronics Inc., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 / This case is scheduled for an Interim Case Management Conference on March 7, 2011. On February 25, 2011, the parties submitted a Joint Case Management Statement for Interim Conference. (See Docket Item No. 36.) In their Joint Statement, the parties indicate that they do not foresee any issues in complying with the Court's schedule, which set a Case Tutorial and Claim Construction Hearing on May 6, 2011 and that they anticipate filing an administrative request for additional time pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11 for the tutorial and claim construction presentations. (See id.) Upon review of the parties' statement, the Court finds a conference unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the March 7 Case Management Conference. The Court will set a date for a further Case Management Conference in its Order following the Claim Construction Proceedings.

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

In addition, upon review of the patents-in-suit, the Court GRANTS the parties' request for an additional fifteen minutes each to present their tutorials and an additional thirty minutes each for their claim construction presentation.1

Dated: March 2, 2011 JAMES WARE United States District Chief Judge

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In light of this Order, the Court finds that an administrative request for additional time pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 is unnecessary. 2
1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Ary Chang [e-mail] Dana Johannes Finberg [e-mail] Gina Ann Bibby [e-mail] Jerold I. Schneider [e-mail] Jimmy M. Shin [e-mail] John C. Vetter [e-mail] Richard Allan Horning [e-mail] Robert F. Kramer [e-mail] Stephanie Renee Wood [e-mail] Dated: March 2, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy

8 9 10

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28