Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) PTE. Ltd. v. IPtronics Inc. et al
Filing
607
ORDER RE: MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME, MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on June 10, 2015 re 597 , 598 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN JOSE DIVISION
13
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
16
v.
IPTRONICS INC., et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
21
Case No.: 5:10-cv-02863-EJD
ORDER RE: MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME, MOTION TO COMPEL
(Re: Docket Nos. 597, 598)
Avago moves to compel IPtronics’ production of evaluation boards1 and moves to shorten
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
time.2 In response, IPtronics contends that before filing its motions Avago failed to meet and
confer as required by Civ. L.R. 6-3(a)(2).3
22
The parties’ failures to meet and confer have become habitual.4 The court therefore orders
23
24
the parties to meet and confer on the motions in dispute in the undersigned’s jury room no later
25
1
See Docket No. 597.
2
See Docket No. 598.
3
See Docket No. 604 at 2.
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:10-cv-02863-EJD
ORDER RE: MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME, MOTION TO COMPEL
1
than June 12 at 3:30 p.m. Arrangements may be made by contacting Oscar Rivera, courtroom
2
deputy to the undersigned. Only after the parties have certified their compliance by declaration
3
will the court entertain any remaining motions at issue.
4
SO ORDERED.
5
Dated: June 10, 2015
6
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
4
28
See, e.g., Docket No. 567.
2
Case No.: 5:10-cv-02863-EJD
ORDER RE: MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME, MOTION TO COMPEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?