Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) PTE. Ltd. v. IPtronics Inc. et al

Filing 607

ORDER RE: MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME, MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on June 10, 2015 re 597 , 598 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN JOSE DIVISION 13 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 14 Plaintiffs, 15 16 v. IPTRONICS INC., et al., 17 Defendants. 18 21 Case No.: 5:10-cv-02863-EJD ORDER RE: MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME, MOTION TO COMPEL (Re: Docket Nos. 597, 598) Avago moves to compel IPtronics’ production of evaluation boards1 and moves to shorten 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) time.2 In response, IPtronics contends that before filing its motions Avago failed to meet and confer as required by Civ. L.R. 6-3(a)(2).3 22 The parties’ failures to meet and confer have become habitual.4 The court therefore orders 23 24 the parties to meet and confer on the motions in dispute in the undersigned’s jury room no later 25 1 See Docket No. 597. 2 See Docket No. 598. 3 See Docket No. 604 at 2. 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:10-cv-02863-EJD ORDER RE: MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME, MOTION TO COMPEL 1 than June 12 at 3:30 p.m. Arrangements may be made by contacting Oscar Rivera, courtroom 2 deputy to the undersigned. Only after the parties have certified their compliance by declaration 3 will the court entertain any remaining motions at issue. 4 SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: June 10, 2015 6 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 4 28 See, e.g., Docket No. 567. 2 Case No.: 5:10-cv-02863-EJD ORDER RE: MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME, MOTION TO COMPEL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?