Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) PTE. Ltd. v. IPtronics Inc. et al

Filing 631

ORDER re 621 MOTION for Reconsideration Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge Grewal (D.I. 609) filed by Avago Technologies U.S. Inc., Avago Technologies General IP (Singapor e) PTE Ltd., Avago Technologies International Sales PTE. Ltd., Avago Technologies Trading Ltd. Response due by 7/22/2015, not to exceed five pages in length. No reply brief shall be filed or considered. The Motion will then be deemed submitted for decision and the court will issue an order based on the pleadings. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/8/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2015) Modified on 7/8/2015 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES FIBER IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., et al., 9 Plaintiffs, 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 v. IPTRONICS, INC., et al., Case No. 5:10-cv-02863-EJD ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Re: Dkt. No. 621 Defendants. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-2, Defendants shall file their written opposition to 14 Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Relief from Non-Dispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge 15 (Docket Item No. 621), if any, on or before July 22, 2015. Any opposition brief shall not exceed 16 five pages in length. No reply brief shall be filed or considered. The Motion will then be deemed 17 submitted for decision and the court will issue an order based on the pleadings. 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 8, 2015 ______________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:10-cv-02863-EJD ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?