Campos et al v. Posh Bakery Holding Company, Inc. et al
Filing
37
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL re 36 Stipulation filed by Ricardo Lopez. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 24, 2012. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
ADAM WANG, Bar. No. 201233
LAW OFFICES OF ADAM WANG
12 S. First Street, Suite 708
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone:
(408) 292-1040
Facsimile:
(408) 416-0248
(adamqwang@gmail.com)
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
CAMPOS, et. al.,
9
10
11
12
13
14
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Case No. 10-02873 PSG
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL & [PROPOSED]
ORDER THEREON
POSH BAKERY HOLDING COMPANY,
INC., et. al.,
Defendants
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Parties have fully settled this case. Parties hereby stipulate to dismiss this case in its entirety
with prejudice. Each party to bear its own fees and costs.
Parties stipulate and request that this Court retain its jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing
the settlement agreement.
Dated: April 20, 2012
By:
23
24
/s/ Adam Wang
ADAM WANG
Law Office of Adam Wang
Attorney for Plaintiffs
25
Dated: April 20, 2012
DAVENPORT GERSTNER & McCLURE
26
/s/
___________________________________
Stephen Thomas Davenport, Jr.
Attorney for Defendants
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
Campos et al. v. Posh Bakery Inc., et al
CASE NO. 10-02873 PSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed in its
3
entirety with prejudice. This court will retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the settlement
4
agreement in this case.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: April ___, 2012
24
By: ________________________________
Paul Singh Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
Campos et al. v. Posh Bakery Inc., et al
CASE NO. 10-02873 PSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?