Calamateos v. Astrue
Filing
31
STIPULATION AND ORDER for Award of Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act re 30 . Signed by Judge Koh on 6/15/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MELINDA L. HAAG, CSBN 132612
United States Attorney
LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX,
Social Security Administration
ELIZABETH FIRER, SBN WI 1034148
Special Assistant United States Attorney
333 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8937
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: Elizabeth.Firer@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MARIA CALAMATEOS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of
)
Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________)
CIVIL NO. C10-02900 LHK
STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING
SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel,
subject to the Court’s approval, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act,
(EAJA) in the amount of ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1000.00). This amount represents compensation
for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Additionally, the Commissioner is waiving the time requirement for
filing an EAJA application in this case based on factors specific to this case only. This agreement should
not be construed as a general waiver of timeliness.
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the Government will
consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s attorney. Pursuant
to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (U.S. June 14, 2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend
on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of
1
the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the Government will
2
determine whether they are subject to any offset. Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but
3
if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the Government
4
shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Harvey P. Sackett, pursuant to
5
the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel.
6
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees
7
and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA.
8
Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that
9
Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with
10
11
12
this action.
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security Act
attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA.
13
14
/s/ Harvey P. Sackett
(As authorized via email)
HARVEY P. SACKETT
Sackett and Associates
1055 Lincoln Avenue
P.O. Box 5025
San Jose, CA 95150-5025
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: June 10, 2011
15
16
17
18
MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney
19
20
Dated: June 10, 2011
By:
21
22
23
24
/s/ Elizabeth Firer
ELIZABETH FIRER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in
the amount of ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1000.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject
to the terms of the above referenced Stipulation.
25
26
27
June 15, 2011
Dated: __________________
_____________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?