Tietze v. Apple, Inc
Filing
4
Declination to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge and Request For Reassignment To A United States District Judge by Apple, Inc (Preovolos, Penelope) (Filed on 7/6/2010) Modified on 7/7/2010 (bw, COURT STAFF).
Tietze v. Apple, Inc
Doc.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607) PPreovolos@mofo.com ANDREW DAVID MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694) AMuhlbach@mofo.com HEATHER A. MOSER (CA SBN 212686) HMoser@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
STEVE TIETZE, on Behalf of Himself and for the Case No. CV 10-02929 HRL Benefit of All with the Common or General Interest, Any Persons Injured, and All Others DECLINATION TO PROCEED Similarly Situated, BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR Plaintiff, REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE v. [N.D. CAL. CIVIL LR 73-1(a)(1)] APPLE INC., a California Corporation. The Hon. Howard R. Lloyd Defendant. Complaint filed: July 2, 2010
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CV 10-02929 HRL sf-2867246
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The undersigned party hereby declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition and hereby requests the reassignment of this case to a United States District Judge.
Dated: July 6, 2010
PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS ANDREW DAVID MUHLBACH HEATHER A. MOSER MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
By:
/s/ Penelope A. Preovolos PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC.
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CV 10-02929 HRL sf-2867246
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?