Barrous et al v. BP P.L.C. et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 11 . Signed by Judge Koh on 8/20/2010. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2010)

Barrous et al v. BP P.L.C. et al

Doc. 17

1

2
J

Jeffrey M. Hamerling (Bar No. 91532) iham erlinsØarchemorris.com Þrutnp ntTù T. Perez (Bar No. 234030) Tp ercz@ar chernorris. c om

4
5

ARCHERNORRIS 2033 North Main Street, Suite 800 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-3759

Telephone:

Facsimile:

925.930.6600 925.930.6620

6

7
8

o
10

Attomevs for Defendants BP o.l.c.. BP Exploration & Oil, l¡c. (a dissolved comoratíon), erroneously sued herein as BP Exôloration and Oil, lnc., BP Products North America Inc., and BP Corporation North America lnc.

TINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

i1
72
13

I4
15

Maria Barrous, an individual and as Trustee of the Barrous Living Trust, Demetrois Banous, an individual, dba Jimmy's Restaurant,

LHK CaseNo. CL0-02944LHK

I6
17

Plaintiffs,

i8
19

20
27

BP p.l.c., BP Exploration and Oil' Inc.' BP Products North America, Inc , BP Comoration North America, Inc., ConocoPhillips Company and DOES l-20. inclusive, Defendants.

STIPULATION AND IPROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION FOR BP P.L.C., BP EXPLORÄTION AND OIL' INC.. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AIUERICA rNC.: AND BP CORPORATTON NORTTI AMÉRICA INC. AND CONOCOPHILLPS COMPANYTO ANSWEROR OTHERWISE R.ESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT

22 23

TO THE COIIRT AND TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:

25

PursuanttoLocalRule6-i(a),PlaintiffsMariaBarrous,anindividualandasTrusteeof Jimmy's Restaurant (collectively the Barrous Living Trust, Demetrois Barrous, an individual, dba
.,Plaintiffs,') and defendants BP p.l.c., BP Exploration &
erroneously sued herein as BP Exploration and

lo
27 28

oil, Inc.

(a dissolved corporation),

oil, Inc., BP Products North America Inc., and BP
STIP. AND EXT. OF TIME TO RESPOND AND IPROPOSED] ORDER

stipulate, through their corporation North America Inc. (collectively "BP Defendants") hereby

c

10-02944

PW

Dockets.Justia.com

1

attorneys ofrecord, as follows:

2
3

A.OnMay20,2010,plaintiffsMariaBarrous,anindividualandasTrusteeofthe

Srto¡s living

Trust, and Demetrois Barrous, an individual, dba Jimmy's Restaurant

4
5

(colleotively referred to hereinafter as "Plaiûtiffs") fited their complairrt in the Superior Court of
fhe State of California in and for the City of
SarL Jose

and County of Santa Clara erfüúed

Mariî

6 7
8 9
10
11

Barrous, et aL v. BP, ef aL, as case Number 1-10-cv-172452 ("StaÍe

naming the BP

Defendants, among others. The State Action was subsequently removed by the BP Defendants to the San Jose Division of the Northern District of the United States District Court on July 6, 2010'

^cfion"),

B.

Plaintiffs and the BP Defendants filed a first stipulation to extend the response

dates rmtil Augus

t

12,2010. The first stipulation extended the time to respond by nol more than
any ofthe BP Defendant

tlirty (30) days for

12
13

c.

In orde¡ to coordinate response dates with Defendant conocoPhillips company

and to further explore whether the defendants may retain cornmon counsel, the BP Defendants seek an additional

t4
15 16 77
18

l0 days to August 22,2010, to file a response ø Plaintiffs' complaint. STIPULÀTION

Plaintiffs and the BP Defendants, by their respective attomeys of record, hereby stþlate
as

follows and request the Court enter an order embodying their stipulation:

1.

Plaintffs and the BP Defendants and have agteed to exlend and oonsolidate the

t9
20
21.

response date for all

ofthe BP Defendants by l0 days,

such that the new response date to a¡swer

or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint by the BP Defendants shall be

@@2010.

IT IS SO STIPIILATED:
Dated: August 1i, 2011

22
23

LAS/ OFFICES OF STEVEN A. ELLENBERG

24
25
¿o

Steven A.

27 28
STIP. AND EXT. OF TIME TO RESPOND AND [PROPOSED] ORDER c I ô-orq¿¿ pvT

1

Dated: August 11, 2010

ARCHERNORRIS

2 J 4
5

6

/S/ Jefftey M. Hamerling Jeffrey M. Hamerling Attomevs for Defendants BP n.l.c.. BP Exploration & Oit, Inc. (a dissolved corporation), erroneously sued herein as BP Explorãtion and Oi1, Inc', BP Produ,cts North America lnc., BP Corporation North America Inc.

1
8

IPROPOSED] ORDER
PI-,T.SUANT TO STIPIILATION, IT IS SO ORDERED thAt:

9

t0
11

1.

The due date for the BP Defendants to respond to the Plaintiffs' complaint

sha11

be extended to AttgusT 22,2010-

12
73

Dated: August 20, 2010.

T4
15

-,

76
T7 18

Honorable United States District Judge

19

80314136/1000474-l

20

2l
22
23

24
25

26 27
28
STIP. AND EXT. OF TIME TO RESPOND AND IPROPOSED] ORDER

c

10-02944 PVT